Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What exactly are your objections to Emacs' compile-mode and
> gdb-mode? I find them to be quite useful. Perhaps you could write
> some extensions that would make them more useful to you.
I used to use CodeWarrior back when I was a Mac user (yes, I was), a
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 10:29:50PM -0400, SEGV wrote:
> I'm sitting here looking at my unused copy of Visual Studio 5.0 for
> Windows, and thinking of the pathetic UNIX IDEs I have used in the past
> two years.
>
> - SparcWorks on Solaris
> - Softbench on HP-UX
> - ladebug etc. on Digital UNIX
I believe the `Cygnus Foundry', by Cygnus, is a
UNIX-based IDE - not certain, though. But like
most commercial UNIX software, it costs a pretty
penny.
-c
SEGV> I'm sitting here looking at my unused copy of Visual Studio 5.0 for
> Windows, and thinking of the pathetic UNIX IDEs I have used in t
Even XEmacs with Sparcworks integration doesn't do it for me. So
basically I use XEmacs to edit my source and make files, and the command
line to compile. I debug with whatever debugger is best for the platform
I am using that day.
What exactly are your objections to Emacs' compile-mod
4 matches
Mail list logo
