On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:04:57PM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 20:43 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > THAT is cool.
> >
> > FWIW, FYI, I did some work on that and managed to build xulrunner with
> > basic sonames through quite clean additions
Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 20:43 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > THAT is cool.
>
> FWIW, FYI, I did some work on that and managed to build xulrunner with
> basic sonames through quite clean additions to the mozilla build system
> for the base tree and the nspr tree. I still need to do similar wo
> > Yes, sonames can be more or less arbitrary strings. You can certainly use
> > sonames with "debian" in them with a fairly high degree of confidence that
> > upstream won't collide with them.
>
> THAT is cool.
FWIW, FYI, I did some work on that and managed to build xulrunner with
basic sonam
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:28:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Will all the tools resolving the dependencies be fine with a dependency
> > on a virtual package without one an a real package ? (like f
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:16:38AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:28:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > > So my idea is the following :
> > > > > - First, I want to provide the lib
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:28:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > So my idea is the following :
> > > > - First, I want to provide the libs with a correct soname. It won't be
> > > > compatible with upstream u
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > So my idea is the following :
> > > - First, I want to provide the libs with a correct soname. It won't be
> > > compatible with upstream until some people use clue sticks, but i'll do
> > > my best for them to improve on that point
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 05:52:03PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:47:47PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > As you may or may not know, I'm currently working on packaging
> > xulrunner, which is ought to be the central point for all future mozilla
> >
Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi
>
> As you may or may not know, I'm currently working on packaging
> xulrunner, which is ought to be the central point for all future mozilla
> technology, meaning that at more or less long term, all mozilla products
> (firefox, thunderbird, etc.) will be built on top of it
9 matches
Mail list logo
