Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-04-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 09:56 am, Daniel Burrows wrote: >   We can also extend the description format in backwards-compatible ways. >  So, while a proper markup language would be nice, that doesn't preclude > fixing the bullet problem, albeit in a slightly hacky way, NOW.  What about > this:

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-04-07 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Branden Robinson] > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > twofish > > Go ahead and file a bug for this one, please Sorry, no can do - twofish isn't actually uncontroversially buggy. It handles bullet lists in the de facto standard way, which I didn't like, but I have since been persuad

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-04-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 03:54:36AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Peter Samuelson] > > I'd like to file a mass bug for these, but it's on the order of 583 > > binary packages in 430 source packages, so I obviously want to get > > some feedback first. > > Jeroen van Wolffelaar pointed out to me t

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 11:44 am, Andrew Suffield wrote: > I know of at least two such languages. Don't include 'o'. Ok, will do. Or, um, not do. Daniel -- /--- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --\ |Human beings were created by water to transpor

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:56:36AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Bullet characters are (maybe) "-", "+", "*", and "o"; the frontend may > render them literally or modify their appearence as it deems appropriate. > NOTE: it might be a good idea to exclude "o"; I doubt many packages use "o" >

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 09:56 am, Daniel Burrows wrote: >   A line beginning with two or more spaces, followed by a bullet character > and a space, is considered to be an element of a bulleted list.  Every > succeeding line that begins with N+1 or more spaces, where N is the number > of spaces p

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 05:19 am, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Ideally, all packaging tools would support some kind of very simple > markup language to support enumerations in a sane way, but that's a > long-term project. There's room in the description standard for future extensions: quoti

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:42:24AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > Omitting the check for forced word-wrapping in bullets cuts down the > list of offenders drastically. The following are source packages that > actually display _incorrectly_ in dselect / aptitude because bullet > points incorrectly

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jeroen van Wolffelaar] > It seems like this list has a lot of false positives, take for example > php-mail-mime: > > | Description: PHP PEAR module for creating and decoding MIME messages > | Provides classes to deal with creation and manipulation of mime messages: > | . > | * mime.php: Crea

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 03:54:36AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Peter Samuelson] > > I'd like to file a mass bug for these, but it's on the order of 583 > > binary packages in 430 source packages, so I obviously want to get > > some feedback first. > > Jeroen van Wolffelaar pointed out to m

Re: Bug#302138: incorrect Description line wrapping with bullet lists

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] > I'd like to file a mass bug for these, but it's on the order of 583 > binary packages in 430 source packages, so I obviously want to get > some feedback first. Jeroen van Wolffelaar pointed out to me that 430 source packages is a bit much for a mass bug, especially if lintian/