mdz writes:
> When I open a Debian changelog, I expect to see changes which are
> pertinent to Debian development. This obviously includes changes which
> affect the status of Debian bug reports.
>From Debian-Policy 3.5.10.0:
Debian Policy Manual - Source packages (from old Packaging Manual)
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:06:12PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> mdz writes:
> > When I open a Debian changelog, I expect to see changes which are
> > pertinent to Debian development. This obviously includes changes which
> > affect the status of Debian bug reports.
>
> >From Debian-Policy 3.5.10.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:36:20 +1000, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Even if the bug is for upstream fixing a typo in a comment? :)
>>
>> If it caused a Debian bug to be closed, that is a significant
>> change in status for the Debian packa
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:36:20 +1000, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> If it caused a Debian bug to be closed, that is a significant
> >> change in status for the Debian packa
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>> > What if the bug was reported after the new Debian package was
>> > uploaded? Why does it suddenly stop being a significant change?
This is meant to be a rhetorical question.
> My a
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:51:07PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Which just proves that listing things in the changelog on the basis of bug
> reports is meaningless.
No, it only shows that it is not possible under some circumstances:
specifically, when there was no bug report at the time. To say th
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:51:07 +1000, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>
>>> > What if the bug was reported after the new Debian package was
>>> > uploaded? Why does it suddenly stop
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:36:24 +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:36:20 +1000, Herbert Xu
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> If it caused a Debia
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:04:55PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:36:24 +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:42:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Good point. Shall we mandate that all bug closures be adequately
> >> documented
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Good point. Shall we mandate that all bug closures be adequately
> >> documented in the ChangeLog? I would be quite happy with that.
> I do think bug closures be documented in the ChangeLog (I
> shall attempt to do so from now on for every real bug that is close
10 matches
Mail list logo
