On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 01:05:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Happy new year from this side of the world,
>
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:06:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Three packages (w3mir, webmin, and fancylogin) that were definitely
> > available in Debian main some time ago, an
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:09:07PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> There is a further weird package disappearance in unstable: all mgetty
> >> packages (execept mgetty-doc) are gone!
[...]
> >> Hey, these are important packages.
>
Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Joey, can you put that where it originally came from? or next to the
> original script? Any changes to the script from your side?
This is much more complicated than anything I want to maintain. I'm
looking forward to making my mirror script simpler as the pool
situations
> " " == Tinguaro Barreno Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello again.
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:22:45PM +, Miquel van
> Smoorenburg wrote:
>> Yes. The structure of the archive has changed because of
>> 'package pools'. You need to mirror 'pool' as well.
Hello again.
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:22:45PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> Yes. The structure of the archive has changed because of 'package pools'.
> You need to mirror 'pool' as well.
>
> Also, "woody" is no longer "unstable". "sid" is. "woody" is "testing".
>
> Mike.
>
Ok. T
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 05:01:13PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> You file the wishlistbug against ftp. and I bug the admins, deal?
Deal is deal!
Best wishes,
Guenter
--
Linux: Who needs GATES in a world without fences?
Hi Guenter!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Guenter Bechly wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 03:50:52PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > FWIF I'ld really like to see removal of packages beeing announced to
> > debian-devel-changes and debian-changes repectivly. Maybe we could
> > bug the f
Hi Josip!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 03:40:41PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > Again there is a pointer from packages.debian.org, but the deb is not
> > > in the directory pointed to.
> >
> > Seems like packages.debian.org is broken then. If it's not r
Hello again,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 03:50:52PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> FWIF I'ld really like to see removal of packages beeing announced to
> debian-devel-changes and debian-changes repectivly. Maybe we could
> bug the ftp admins to send such mails?
Agree. Will you do it, or shall I ?
>
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 03:40:41PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Again there is a pointer from packages.debian.org, but the deb is not
> > in the directory pointed to.
>
> Seems like packages.debian.org is broken then. If it's not reportet yet,
> maybe someone should do.
It is! Several times!
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi GBechly!
>> Fancylogin is reported to be in
>> unstable and there also is a package page, but the package is not
>> found from the download page and is also not present in any of
>> the mirrors.
>
>marvin:~# apt-get
Happy new year from this side of the world,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:06:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Three packages (w3mir, webmin, and fancylogin) that were definitely
> available in Debian main some time ago, and that are still present
> in the BTS (all have outstanding bugs), COMPLE
Hi Guenter,
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> I suggest that the intent to
> remove a package should always be filed as a bug to this package or even
> better as a bug to wnpp-peudopackage, so that the information can be
> traced with rea
Hi Oliver!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> There is a further weird package disappearance in unstable: all mgetty
> >> packages (execept mgetty-doc) are gone!
> >
> >http://bugs.debian.org/80640
> >
> >
> >>
Hi Tinguaro!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Tinguaro Barreno Delgado wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I maintain a rsync mirror of potato and woody (i386) and this week the
> distribution has lost +50 packages. They aren't in ftp.debian.org (I'm
> rsyncing from ftp.de.debian.org). Can anyone explain this?
Have
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:06:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am very sorry for the loud subject of my mail (I know it is bad
> netiquette), but since I got no satisfying answer on my first mail
> concerning "disappeared packages" and because the issue is important
> I decided to try it ag
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tinguaro Barreno Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I maintain a rsync mirror of potato and woody (i386) and this week the
>distribution has lost +50 packages. They aren't in ftp.debian.org (I'm
>rsyncing from ftp.de.debian.org). Can anyone explain this?
Yes. Th
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:06:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am very sorry for the loud subject of my mail (I know it is bad
> netiquette), but since I got no satisfying answer on my first mail
> concerning "disappeared packages" and because the issue is important
> I decided to
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:46:20PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> SCHREI NICHT SO!
Vielen Dank für Deine prompte und ausführliche Antwort. Wenn Du
auf mein erstes (ungeschriehenes) Mail zum selben Thema so
geantwortet hättest, dann hätte ich jetzt nicht schreien müssen.
Also hat es ja immer
Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> There is a further weird package disappearance in unstable: all mgetty
>> packages (execept mgetty-doc) are gone!
>
>http://bugs.debian.org/80640
>
>
>> Hey, these are important packages.
>
>mgetty is not important,
Hi GBechly!
SCHREI NICHT SO!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am very sorry for the loud subject of my mail (I know it is bad
> netiquette), but since I got no satisfying answer on my first mail
> concerning "disappeared packages" and because the issue is important
> I decided t
21 matches
Mail list logo
