On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > 2) Are we really going to freeze slink in 7 days?
>
> I dont think we should freeze until we have a broken libc in slink...
^
Hmpf... I meant while :)
--
Madarasz Ger
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
> 2) Are we really going to freeze slink in 7 days?
I dont think we should freeze until we have a broken libc in slink...
--
Madarasz Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:53:39PM +0200, J.H.M.Dassen wrote:
> > 2) Are we really going to freeze slink in 7 days?
>
> Yes.
Oops, I better hurry with my pending iceconf upload. :-)
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go SF49ers!
Senior-Consultant |
> Does this mean also "no new documentation"?
No.
> For slink, I plan to provide the texi2html-converted HTML for all my GNU
> packages, which means a new package foo-doc for every GNU foo package.
> Do I absolutely have to do this before the freeze? Will all my foo-doc
> packages be rejected be
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
> The general guideline for "frozen" is:
>
> no new code
>
> A recompile with a new package is fine. Fixes to make something work with
> a change in another package is also fine.
Does this mean also "no new documentation"?
For slink, I plan to prov
> > 1) Don't we have to recompile all our ncurses-based apps against 4.2?
>
> If we want all the ncurses-based apps to use the same version of ncurses,
> yes. I'm not sure if we have to, though if I were the release manager, I
> wouldn't release 2.1 before all ncurses-based apps used the same vers
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:53:19PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> 1) Don't we have to recompile all our ncurses-based apps against 4.2?
If we want all the ncurses-based apps to use the same version of ncurses,
yes. I'm not sure if we have to, though if I were the release manager, I
wouldn't release
7 matches
Mail list logo
