Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>> Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
So far this is independent of third packages which is IMHO fine and
desirable. So far, this could be solved by a postfix-conf.d-snippet
shipped with the amavis package
On Wed, 26 May 2010 18:42:50 +0200, Michael Banck
wrote:
>Eh, Debian can patch upstream software if it thinks it is necessary for
>inter-operation, that's the one of the major points of having a
>distribution.
This is not always liked by the upstream communities though. For
example, the exim com
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>>> So far this is independent of third packages which is IMHO fine and
>>> desirable. So far, this could be solved by a postfix-conf.d-snippet
>>> shipped with the amavis package.
>> Quite not. You also need
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>> So far this is independent of third packages which is IMHO fine and
>> desirable. So far, this could be solved by a postfix-conf.d-snippet
>> shipped with the amavis package.
> Quite not. You also need to configure the incoming and outgoing
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> So far this is independent of third packages which is IMHO fine and
> desirable. So far, this could be solved by a postfix-conf.d-snippet
> shipped with the amavis package.
Quite not. You also need to configure the incoming and outgoing ports of
amavis the correct
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>> Why would you like to go another way with mail servers?
> Because upstream doesn't want a conf.d folder, unfortunately, and that
Well, you can have something equal without upstream support by
concatenating conf.d snippets into one huge con
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" wrote:
>Scott Kitterman kitterman.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Additionally, Ubuntu ships a distro specific binary called dovecot-postfix
>> that implements part of this
>> vision already. We'd love to see it in Debian if the dovecot maintainer is
>> interested.
>>
>
>The dovec
Scott Kitterman kitterman.com> writes:
>
> Additionally, Ubuntu ships a distro specific binary called dovecot-postfix
> that implements part of this
> vision already. We'd love to see it in Debian if the dovecot maintainer is
> interested.
>
The dovecot maintainer might be interested if so
"Roberto C. Sánchez" wrote:
>On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 06:42:50PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:58:26PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> > Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>> > > I'm installing apache2 and have a web server - more or less working,
>> > > I'm installing dh
]] Michael Banck
| On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:58:26PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
| > Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
| > > I'm installing apache2 and have a web server - more or less working,
| > > I'm installing dhelp and ... magic, magic ... it extends the running
| > > web-server to serve the
On 05/26/2010 02:29 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, postfix is NOT the only package that we shall consider modifying
here. As per my original post, there's loads of other components that
are to configure as well. The question is: is there a will to do this
job by other maintainers. I am
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 11:42 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:58:26PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
I'm installing apache2 and have a web server - more or less working,
I'm installing dhelp and ... magic, magic ... it ext
Thomas: Sorry for the private mail, I hit the wrong reply button.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:58:26PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > I'm installing apache2 and have a web server - more or less working,
> > I'm installing dhelp and ... magic, magic ... it extends t
On 05/26/2010 11:42 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:58:26PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
I'm installing apache2 and have a web server - more or less working,
I'm installing dhelp and ... magic, magic ... it extends the running
web-server to ser
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 06:42:50PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:58:26PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > > I'm installing apache2 and have a web server - more or less working,
> > > I'm installing dhelp and ... magic, magic ... it exten
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:58:26PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > I'm installing apache2 and have a web server - more or less working,
> > I'm installing dhelp and ... magic, magic ... it extends the running
> > web-server to serve the dhelp content as well. I'm i
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> I'm installing apache2 and have a web server - more or less working,
> I'm installing dhelp and ... magic, magic ... it extends the running
> web-server to serve the dhelp content as well. I'm installing smb2www
> and it extends the running web-server to act as smb
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 15:58:51 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Why would you like to go another way with mail servers?
> Get maintainer support for such conf.d directories, maybe get upstream
> support for such conf.d mimics (sendmail most likely won't need it -
> some m4 magic and triggers wil
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> What happens here is that, if you take a normal Debian system, then
> install postfix, then let's say amavis, they don't talk to each other.
...
> much spams. It is also totally unrealistic to say that it's up to the
> system administrator to configure everything by hand. I
19 matches
Mail list logo
