Goswin von Brederlow (17/03/2009):
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
> > I am interested in seeing the dpkg patch.
>
> The most current work should be on the multiarch alioth project. If
> you do work on something please add it there.
>
> http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=310911
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>>
>> > Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> >> And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
>> >> not "before". This is after it has already killed mul
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> > Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> >> And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
> >> not "before". This is after it has already killed multiarch for 2
> >> stable release
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
>> not "before". This is after it has already killed multiarch for 2
>> stable releases. If we don't get things moving in parallel it will
>> never be ready for squeeze
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>>
>> > If you want to get some more multiarch ennemies, this is clearly the way
>> > to go.
>> >
>> > The alternate method is to post a list to debian-devel, and when we have
>> > a
Hi
Dne Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:34:28 +0100
Goswin von Brederlow napsal(a):
> So we should just ignore blatant policy violation until the moment they
> do bite us in the ass? So we wait until the verry last moment when
> everything would be ready to use multiarch and then we freeze squeeze
> before p
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
>>> some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
>>>
>>> Gi
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
>> some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
>>
>> Given that the problems are quite easily d
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> > If you want to get some more multiarch ennemies, this is clearly the way
> > to go.
> >
> > The alternate method is to post a list to debian-devel, and when we have
> > a basic multiarch support, you may
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> If you want to get some more multiarch ennemies, this is clearly the way
> to go.
>
> The alternate method is to post a list to debian-devel, and when we have
> a basic multiarch support, you may start thinking about filling bugs.
> Not before.
Well, regardless of the be
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
> some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
>
> Given that the problems are quite easily detectable I'm considering
> scann
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 12:11 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> Example: libgtk2.0-0 contains /etc/gtk-2.0/im-multipress.conf
>>
>> For this I want to file bugs (on top of violations of the MUST
>> directive) requesting that either the conffile is split into a
>
Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 12:11 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Example: libgtk2.0-0 contains /etc/gtk-2.0/im-multipress.conf
>
> For this I want to file bugs (on top of violations of the MUST
> directive) requesting that either the conffile is split into a
> seperate package (say you alread
13 matches
Mail list logo
