-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Roderick Schertler, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>I don't think Andy is taking into account your plan of allowing both
>threaded and non-threaded Perls present on the system at the same time.
That's okay since a) threaded Perl has it's own archi
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 11:28:06AM -0400, Roderick Schertler wrote:
> > Andy Dougherty, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
> >>
> >> After some thought, I think I'd recommend that perl5.005_xx retain the
> >> same directory structure that perl5.00[34]_xx did. (with 5.005 in place of
> >
On 11 Oct 1998, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
torin>Andy Dougherty, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
torin>>After some thought, I think I'd recommend that perl5.005_xx retain the
torin>>same directory structure that perl5.00[34]_xx did. (with 5.005 in place
of
torin>>5.00[34], of c
My $.02 on this - and this is only personal feedback-
is that perl -MCPAN -e shell is even easier than
apt-get. So I maintain a perl5.tgz with our
various modules from CPAN already installed and whenever
debian blows away our perl on any particular machine we
just unpack it from our local distri
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 11:28:06AM -0400, Roderick Schertler wrote:
> On 11 Oct 1998 03:08:22 -0700, "Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > Andy Dougherty, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
> >>
> >> After some thought, I think I'd recommend that perl5.005_xx retain
On 11 Oct 1998 03:08:22 -0700, "Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Andy Dougherty, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>>
>> After some thought, I think I'd recommend that perl5.005_xx retain the
>> same directory structure that perl5.00[34]_xx did. (with 5.005 in plac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Andy Dougherty, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>After some thought, I think I'd recommend that perl5.005_xx retain the
>same directory structure that perl5.00[34]_xx did. (with 5.005 in place of
>5.00[34], of course).
That's good enough for me. I
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> [ perl5.005_02's default library is now /usr/lib/perl5/perl5.005,
> and might change with 5.006, etc.]
>
> > Any idea how to handle this properly ? Maybe we need a sort of perl
> > policy : package will have to install file under /usr/lib/perl5/debian
[ perl5.005_02's default library is now /usr/lib/perl5/perl5.005,
and might change with 5.006, etc.]
> Any idea how to handle this properly ? Maybe we need a sort of perl
> policy : package will have to install file under /usr/lib/perl5/debian
> which would be a symlink to the current perl versi
Previously Bart Schuller wrote:
> This didn't catch vim-perl, which seems to have been statically linked
> to perl, but references the libraries of the current version so should
> be upgraded as well.
It is, since vim's configure couldn't find any shared-libraries for perl.
And from what I see I d
Le Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 06:02:18PM -0700, John Lapeyre écrivait:
> I downloaded the upstream source. It looks like the omission of
> /usr/lib/perl5 in @INC was intentional.
You're right. But this does mean that all packages installing *.pm
files need to be updated. It does also mean that we
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
rhertz>Well it doesn't work out of the box as I expected it. First the
rhertz>@INC isn't correct, it doesn't contain /usr/lib/perl5. Please
rhertz>Darren can you correct it ?
I downloaded the upstream source. It looks like the omission of
/usr/li
On Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 01:35:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The perl package is in incoming. So here is the list of the 33 packages that
> need to be updated. The maintainers are listed. The list corresponds to
> package which contains filenames matching "/usr/lib/perl5.*\.so".
This didn't
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
rhertz>And wait for a new perl package so that *.pm file will install themselves
rhertz>in /usr/lib/perl5 instead of /usr/lib/perl5/5.005.
O, I thought it was perhaps intentional. Could you please notify
this list when you upload the new package ?
Le Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 02:22:50PM -0700, Stephen Zander écrivait:
> Just for my own curiousity: did Darren build this package or is it an
> NMU?
It's Darren. I would have never done a NMU without Darren's approval and
without the consent of the ML.
> You need to download a more up-to-date Packag
> "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> Hello everybody, The perl package is in incoming. So here
Raphael> is the list of the 33 packages that need to be
Raphael> updated. The maintainers are listed. The list corresponds
Raphael> to package which con
Le Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 10:56:28PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
> Nevertheless I tried to recompile my lib*perl modules and second problem
> comes to me : dpkg-shlibdeps seems no to work anymore (in fact the launch
> is ok but it fails to do what it should (set debian/substvars))... I'm
> looki
Le Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 01:35:46PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
> The perl package is in incoming. So here is the list of the 33 packages that
Well it doesn't work out of the box as I expected it. First the
@INC isn't correct, it doesn't contain /usr/lib/perl5. Please
Darren can you correct i
The new perl breaks all my perl-module packages. How badly I don't
know yet. I expected this because I see how the pdl developers scramble to
keep up with new releases of perl.
It can probably be sorted out, but it will take some effort from
all who have perl-module-related package
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> The perl package is in incoming. So here is the list of the 33 packages that
> need to be updated. The maintainers are listed. The list corresponds to
> package which contains filenames matching "/usr/lib/perl5.*\.so".
FYI, this package doesn't build properly on the Alp
Re: installing perl
There is a problem, which is detailed below. I just used
--force-overwrite to get around it.
homey 3 > ls *.deb
perl-base_5.005.02-1_i386.deb perl_5.005.02-1_i386.deb
homey 4 > dpkg -i *.deb
(Reading database ... 60093 files and directories currently installed
21 matches
Mail list logo
