On 11/11/2014 02:10 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Santiago Vila writes ("Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
> coupling"):
>> The voting process is already complex enough. If it is going to be like this:
>>
>> GR Proposal: Option A.
>> Amendme
Santiago Vila writes ("Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
coupling"):
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I have a half-written series to make it cope with lettered, rather
> > than numbered, options. Would it be worth my
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Neil McGovern writes ("Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
> coupling"):
> > Indeed, unfortunately so. Given the rather rushed nature though, it
> > would be nice to try and work out a way o
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Neil McGovern writes ("Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
> coupling"):
> > Indeed, unfortunately so. Given the rather rushed nature though, it
> > would be nice to try and work out a way o
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I have a half-written series to make it cope with lettered, rather
> than numbered, options. Would it be worth my while finishing that off
> (in my CFT) ?
The voting process is already complex enough. If it is going to be like this:
Neil McGovern writes ("Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
coupling"):
> Indeed, unfortunately so. Given the rather rushed nature though, it
> would be nice to try and work out a way of avoiding having to do this
> manual action in future. I'm curre
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:12:20PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:10:13PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:53:43PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > 57dd4
* Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [141109 22:22]:
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2014, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > (After repetition of the exact wording of the "We aren't convinced"
> > wording that ended up passing, and people pointing out that it *will* be
> > interpreted as TC opposition to the switch, which su
[Please CC me on replies.]
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2014, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > (After repetition of the exact wording of the "We aren't convinced"
> > wording that ended up passing, and people pointing out that it *will* be
> > interpreted as TC opposition to the switch, which sur
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014, Josh Triplett wrote:
> (After repetition of the exact wording of the "We aren't convinced"
> wording that ended up passing, and people pointing out that it *will* be
> interpreted as TC opposition to the switch, which sure enough it did...)
The "we are currently skeptical" wor
[CCed to a wider audience, but reply-to and mail-followup-to set to
avoid a prolonged cross-list thread.]
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> I have a hard time assuming good faith from people who are at war.
>
> /Sune
>
> [17:35:34]
> http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ctte/2014/debian-ctte.2014-10-30-17.00.lo
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:10:13PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:53:43PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
> > [ 5 ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in gene
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:53:43PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
> [ 5 ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
> [ 2 ] Choice 2: Support for other init
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
> [ 5 ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
> [ 3 ] Choice 2: Support for other init systems is recommended, but not
> mandatory
> [ 2 ] Choice 3:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
> [ 3 ] Choice 2: Support for other init systems is recommended, but not
> mandatory
> [ 4 ] Choice 3:
15 matches
Mail list logo
