Re: System sees only 65M of memory

2000-09-11 Thread Erik
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:56:52PM -0600, Art Edwards wrote: I just purchased two Athalon-based systems, each with 768M of ram. However, under debian (potato runnin kernel 2.2.17) the OS sees only 65 M of memory. I have tried to use the append command mem=768M but it still sees only 65 M?

Re: System sees only 65M of memory

2000-09-11 Thread Jason Quigley
Does your bios have the setting memory hole at 64M activated? I'm not sure if that's the exact option. I only vaguely remember something like that as I haven't rebooted for such a long time - and sorry - I refuse to for this! ;-) Cheers, Jason. --On Monday, September 11, 2000 9:20 -0700 Erik

Re: System sees only 65M of memory

2000-09-10 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Art, On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Art Edwards wrote: I just purchased two Athalon-based systems, each with 768M of ram. However, under debian (potato runnin kernel 2.2.17) the OS sees only 65 M of memory. I have tried to use the append command mem=768M but it still sees only 65 M? Does

Re: System sees only 65M of memory

2000-09-10 Thread Aaron Lehmann
On my Athlon, Linux 2.2 sees only 65M of memory without using mem=. Linux 2.4-test seems to fix the problem and detects the memory automatically. On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:56:52PM -0600, Art Edwards wrote: I just purchased two Athalon-based systems, each with 768M of ram. However, under debian

Re: System sees only 65M of memory

2000-09-10 Thread Shigekazu Noka
Aaron Lehmann wrote: On my Athlon, Linux 2.2 sees only 65M of memory without using mem=. Linux 2.4-test seems to fix the problem and detects the memory automatically. Not sure this may do with Athlon, but for your info; Enhanced memory detection patches