> I write as someone preparing an NMU for
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393311.
>
> Template Toolkit 2.15 removed a few plugin modules from the main
> distribution and I would like to package this new version.
> The plugins removed are:
>
> Template::Plugin::DBI
> Template::
On Dec 22, Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The conservative thing to do would be to depend on the new plugin
> modules. I think debian is trying to protect the user from these
While the smart thing to do would be to add a versioned conflict with
the packages which would be broken.
Us
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:06:00PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Dominic Hargreaves ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061222 17:47]:
> > and then upload a new libtemplate-perl reflecting upstream's changes
> > with a NEWS.Debian entry explaining the change? Should libtemplate-perl
> > then Recommend or Dep
* Dominic Hargreaves ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061222 17:47]:
> and then upload a new libtemplate-perl reflecting upstream's changes
> with a NEWS.Debian entry explaining the change? Should libtemplate-perl
> then Recommend or Depend on the new separate plugin modules? My
> intuition would be to avoid a
4 matches
Mail list logo