On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:56:47PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>
> This suggests the real bug may be in debci ... or that there are two bugs.
> (Failing to load the entire page isn't a very helpful response to one
> package having missing data, even if it's a bug somewhere else that the data
>
> Thanks for pointing to the cause! It finally motivated me to look into
> this. I fixed the bug in DMD.
Thanks Lucas!
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2
On 25/05/20 at 09:57 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 UDD/dmd: fails to load when debci data is missing
>
> The problem isn't the number of packages, but some specific packages that
> can't be displayed even when they are the only package requested:
> https://udd.debian.org/dm
Johannes Schauer wrote:
In particular, in the "CI" column, look for those rows where the first line
shows exactly "✔-" -- those packages have to be excluded. Failures are fine and
even both missing is fine but a checkmark followed by a minus triggers that
bug.
Neutral/missing ("⛔-") is also bad
Hi all,
Quoting Johannes Schauer (2020-05-25 14:00:45)
> Quoting Rebecca N. Palmer (2020-05-25 10:57:02)
> > The problem isn't the number of packages, but some specific packages
> > that can't be displayed even when they are the only package requested:
> > https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1=&emai
Hi Rebecca,
Quoting Rebecca N. Palmer (2020-05-25 10:57:02)
> The problem isn't the number of packages, but some specific packages
> that can't be displayed even when they are the only package requested:
> https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1=&email2=&email3=&packages=node-file-entry-cache&ignpacka
Quoting Rebecca N. Palmer (2020-05-25 10:57:02)
> Control: retitle -1 UDD/dmd: fails to load when debci data is missing
>
> The problem isn't the number of packages, but some specific packages
> that can't be displayed even when they are the only package requested:
> https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?e
7 matches
Mail list logo
