Hi,
Am Montag, den 14.02.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
> ]] Petter Reinholdtsen
>
> | I believe we need to come up with a way where most or all package
> | maintainers (perhaps those handling kernel events and early boot stuff
> | should be expected) only need to maintain one boot s
]] Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
| On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > That would mean limiting each init system to the limitations of the most
| > limited init system, which would be a sad state of affairs. Also, I
|
| Yes. So, we also have to set where we want the low bar.
I'd rat
On Monday 14 February 2011 21:00:09 Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Petter Reinholdtsen
> >
> > | I believe we need to come up with a way where most or all package
> > | maintainers (perhaps those handling kernel events and early boot stuf
On Monday 14 February 2011 20:55:06 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | I believe we need to come up with a way where most or all package
> | maintainers (perhaps those handling kernel events and early boot stuff
> | should be expected) only need to maintain one boot setup for their
> | package, and this b
On Feb 14, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> That would mean limiting each init system to the limitations of the most
> limited init system, which would be a sad state of affairs. Also, I
> don't believe there's a 1:1 correspondence between the semantics of all
> the different init systems, making this a
> a way like metainit? http://wiki.debian.org/MetaInit
>
> The project died some two or three years ago and anyone is welcome to
> try to revive it.
Mh it claims it would work only for simple scripts, not for any kind of
scripts, so not all the packages could be converted.
Bye
--
Salvo Tomasell
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> That would mean limiting each init system to the limitations of the most
> limited init system, which would be a sad state of affairs. Also, I
Yes. So, we also have to set where we want the low bar.
> don't believe there's a 1:1 correspondence betwe
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Petter Reinholdtsen
>
> | I believe we need to come up with a way where most or all package
> | maintainers (perhaps those handling kernel events and early boot stuff
> | should be expected) only need to maintain one boot setup for their
]] Petter Reinholdtsen
| I believe we need to come up with a way where most or all package
| maintainers (perhaps those handling kernel events and early boot stuff
| should be expected) only need to maintain one boot setup for their
| package, and this boot setup should be used by all the differe
Hi,
Am Montag, den 14.02.2011, 13:57 +0100 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> I believe we need to come up with a way where most or all package
> maintainers (perhaps those handling kernel events and early boot stuff
> should be expected) only need to maintain one boot setup for their
> package, and t
[Marco Amadori]
> I think it would be interesting for wheezy to easely permit an Admin
> to choose an alternate init system
Sound like a good idea, if it do not give the Debian project a lot of
unneeded work.
> and to permit to package maintainer to carefully provide init script
> tailored for a
11 matches
Mail list logo