Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2012-06-25 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, John David Anglin wrote: > >>Since there is no hppa port any longer, shouldn't we close all > >>hppa-specific bug reports? > >>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?status=open;include=subject%3Ahppa > >why? it's still a port. > I am still building unstable packages and

Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2012-06-25 Thread John David Anglin
On 25-Jun-12, at 7:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: On 25.06.2012 19:34, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Since there is no hppa port any longer, shouldn't we close all hppa-specific bug reports? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?status=open;include=subject%3Ahppa why? it's still a port.

Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2012-06-25 Thread Matthias Klose
On 25.06.2012 19:34, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Since there is no hppa port any longer, shouldn't we close all > hppa-specific bug reports? > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?status=open;include=subject%3Ahppa why? it's still a port. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ

Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2012-06-25 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Since there is no hppa port any longer, shouldn't we close all hppa-specific bug reports? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?status=open;include=subject%3Ahppa -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore H

Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2011-04-11 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 04/10/2011 09:22 PM, Colin Tuckley wrote: >> (Although, now that I think about it, it's probably hard for alpha to be >> considered a viable architecture, unless there is new hardware being >> produced and sold.) > > There needs to be enough reliable hardware available to maintain the > port. W

RE: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2011-04-10 Thread Uwe Schindler
PM > To: debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org; debian- > al...@lists.debian.org; debian-h...@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental > > On 04-01 21:55, Mark Hymers wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As mentioned in the recent ftp-team meeting minute

Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2011-04-10 Thread Colin Tuckley
On 10/04/11 20:04, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I am a mostly dis-interested outsider for both the alpha and hppa > architectures. I write this to be supportive of the ftpmasters. +1 > It seems to me that the alpha porters have had quite a lot of time to > bring the architecture up to the level of qu

Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2011-04-10 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On su, 2011-04-10 at 20:06 +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote: > I today say that alpha disappered from unstable buildd. I am a mostly dis-interested outsider for both the alpha and hppa architectures. I write this to be supportive of the ftpmasters. It seems to me that the alpha porters have had quite

Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental

2011-04-10 Thread Witold Baryluk
On 04-01 21:55, Mark Hymers wrote: > Hi, > > As mentioned in the recent ftp-team meeting minutes, we're planning to > remove alpha and hppa from unstable. They were removed from testing > before the squeeze release and there's no sign that they will be release > architectures for wheezy. As such