On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 08:56:37AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 11:03:16PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > ]] Josh Triplett
> > > > Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > > > I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
> > > >
> > > > That works nicely,
]] Josh Triplett
> [Please CC me on replies.]
>
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Josh Triplett
> > > Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > > I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
> > >
> > > That works nicely, thanks! Seems to have decent performance.
> > >
> > > I couldn't find any announcement
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 11:03:16PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Josh Triplett
> > > Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > > I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
> > >
> > > That works nicely, thanks! Seems to have decent performance.
>
> Ah, that makes sense. I loo
[Please CC me on replies.]
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Josh Triplett
> > Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
> >
> > That works nicely, thanks! Seems to have decent performance.
> >
> > I couldn't find any announcement or documentation of this, other than
>
]] Josh Triplett
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
>
> That works nicely, thanks! Seems to have decent performance.
>
> I couldn't find any announcement or documentation of this, other than
> that on the site itself, though I did find a use of it in a re
On Jul 06, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
I do not, since it does not have local nodes in my country.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
That works nicely, thanks! Seems to have decent performance.
I couldn't find any announcement or documentation of this, other than
that on the site itself, though I did find a use of it in a recent
announcement of dbgsym packa
]] Josh Triplett
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > I'd not actively recommend people use httpredir.debian.org as it's
> > somewhat sporadically maintained.
>
> Do you have any more details on that? Does a better alternative exist?
I personally recommend using deb.debian.org.
> I still have hopes t
Josh,
On 5 July 2016 at 14:53, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> I'd not actively recommend people use httpredir.debian.org as it's
>> somewhat sporadically maintained.
>
> Do you have any more details on that?
There was a discussion[1] on "debian-project" mailing list a few
month
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I'd not actively recommend people use httpredir.debian.org as it's
> somewhat sporadically maintained.
Do you have any more details on that? Does a better alternative exist?
I still have hopes that someday the d-i mirror question becomes an
expert-level question for peop
]] Martin Bagge / brother
> On 2016-07-05 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> > # apt-get update
> > Err:1 http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid InRelease
> > Could not connect to klecker-ftp.debian.org:80 (130.89.148.12),
> > connection timed out [IP: 2001:6b0:e:2018::173 80]
> > Reading package lists.
Hi Martin,
On 07/05/16 10:09, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On 2016-07-05 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> I didn't mention klecker-ftp anywhere in my config files.
>> Its not on the round-robin list for ftp.debian.org either:
>>
>> # host ftp.debian.org
>> ftp.debian.org has address 130.239.18
On 07/05/16 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> this morning I found "apt-get update" getting stuck due to an
> unresponsive host:
>
Sorry, this was supposed to go to debian-user.
Regards
Harri
On 2016-07-05 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> this morning I found "apt-get update" getting stuck due to an
> unresponsive host:
>
> # cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non
14 matches
Mail list logo
