Hideki Yamane writes ("propose: provide "docker" package as docker, not
wmdocker"):
> I'd like to propose wmdocker package would rename its source
> package from docker to wmdocker, and then docker.io package
> provides docker binary package and transitional docker.io package.
Do we have a
Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> On 05/12/22 18:19, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
>> (--> wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker
>> (from docker.io)?
> How was the transition from git-the-file-viewer to
On 05/12/22 18:19, Andreas Metzler wrote:
how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
(--> wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker
(from docker.io)?
How was the transition from git-the-file-viewer to git-the-VCS handled
in lenny/squeeze?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2022 at 18:19:16 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
> (--> wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker
> (from docker.io)?
One option (although I hope someone has a better suggestion) would be
On 2022-12-04 Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to propose wmdocker package would rename its source package
> from docker to wmdocker, and then docker.io package provides docker
> binary package and transitional docker.io package.
> Most of users who is not Debian expert still confusing
5 matches
Mail list logo
