Re: [OT] Re: why does xlibs-pic exist?

On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:02:26PM -0500, Paul Duncan wrote: > * Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > [snipped] > > THIS IS BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO READ. > > Press the little button below tab and above left shift before sending > any more messages. > > ;) It might surprise you, but I ha

[OT] Re: why does xlibs-pic exist?

* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snipped] > THIS IS BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO READ. Press the little button below tab and above left shift before sending any more messages. ;) > -- > G. Branden Robinson|If you wish to strive for peace of > Debian GNU/Linux

Re: why does xlibs-pic exist?

On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:08:34PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > Robinsonitis seems to be a contagious disease... grr, i'm _always_ nice, and *never* rude. -john -- John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] http W

Re: why does xlibs-pic exist?

On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 07:47:46PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > My prophet, we are really glade to hear your non-constructive, needless and > useless critism. Go away and use RedHat where you allways get working > solutions, for more plattforms, better code, hotdogs falling from the sky, > etc. etc

Re: why does xlibs-pic exist?

On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 11:43:18AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > After a number of rants from Branden I rather confused now > as to why xlibs-pic exists at all. THIS IS BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO READ. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200111/msg00028.html -- G. Branden Robin

Re: why does xlibs-pic exist?

#include Jack Howarth wrote on Tue Dec 25, 2001 um 11:43:18AM: > After a number of rants from Branden I rather confused now > as to why xlibs-pic exists at all. As best as I can tell through That is easy. You are not allowed to link static code into shared libraries on certain plattforms. So