On 09/04/2002 08:12:50 AM Christoph Martin wrote:
etc. This has the benefit that it works on every i386 compatible
processor but it is slow on processors where there could be a lot of
optimisation.
Oh not this thread again!
Processor specific optimizations for i386 is debated approx every 2
On 09/04/2002 08:26:19 AM Vince Mulhollon wrote:
I think I can safely speak for everyone on debian-devel as per this:
1) The difference in overall speed is small, and rarely publically
reported.
The 1% gain is individually considered either vital must-have, or
worthless.
2) The archive
Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The idea is to have a standard libssl0.9.6 package with no
optimisation and some optional packages like libssl0.9.6-i686 or
libssl0.9.6-k7 which can replace libssl0.9.6.
The shared library is 179 kB. Why don't you just provide the optimized
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:26:19AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
On 09/04/2002 08:12:50 AM Christoph Martin wrote:
etc. This has the benefit that it works on every i386 compatible
processor but it is slow on processors where there could be a lot of
optimisation.
Oh not this thread again!
Vince Mulhollon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think I can safely speak for everyone on debian-devel as per this:
1) The difference in overall speed is small, and rarely publically
reported. The 1% gain is individually considered either vital
must-have, or worthless.
You have obviously never
Vince Mulhollon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think I can safely speak for everyone on debian-devel as per this:
1) The difference in overall speed is small, and rarely publically
reported. The 1% gain is individually considered either vital
must-have, or worthless.
You have obviously
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:26:19AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
I think I can safely speak for everyone on debian-devel as per this:
1) The difference in overall speed is small, and rarely publically
reported.
The 1% gain is individually considered either vital must-have, or
worthless.
On 09/04/2002 08:51:02 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
wrote:
division and multiplication. Recompiling libssl with SPARCv8
optimizations speeds up logging in with ssh on an Ultra1 (SPARCv9) by
a factor of 6, IIRC. See the debian-sparc archives for details.
This is quite
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:35:58PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
The shared library is 179 kB. Why don't you just provide the optimized
versions in the same package? Are the any stability/correctness issues
Now for the real overachiever, what would be really cool is if you
hacked
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now for the real overachiever, what would be really cool is if you
hacked openssl to do *runtime* detection of which optimizations to use.
That would be indeed much better. I blindly assumed he was talking
about compiler flags and I further
Michael Stone writes:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:35:58PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
The shared library is 179 kB. Why don't you just provide the optimized
versions in the same package? Are the any stability/correctness issues
Now for the real overachiever, what would be really
11 matches
Mail list logo