Obtener BlueMail para Android
En 13 mar. 2022 0:44, en 0:44, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx <secret...@debian.org> escribió: >Hi, > >This is the first call for votes on the General Resolution about voting >secrecy. > > Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC > Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC > >The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process. > >This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution. >You may see the constitution at >https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution. >For voting questions or problems contact secret...@debian.org. > >The details of the general resolution can be found at: >https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_001 > >Also, note that you can get a fresh ballot any time before the end of >the vote by sending a signed mail to > bal...@vote.debian.org >with the subject "gr_vote_secrecy". > >To vote you need to be a Debian Developer. > >HOW TO VOTE > >To cast a vote, it is necessary to send this ballot filled out to a >dedicated e-mail address, in a signed message, as described below. >The dedicated email address this ballot should be sent to is: > > gr_vote_secr...@vote.debian.org > >The form you need to fill out is contained below in this >message, marked with two lines containing the characters >'-=-=-=-=-=-'. Do not erase anything between those lines, and do not >change the choice names. > >There are 4 choices in the form, which you may rank with numbers >between >1 and 4. In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1. >Place a 2 in the brackets next to your next choice. Continue until you >reach your last choice. Do not enter a number smaller than 1 or larger >than 4. > >You may skip numbers, leave some choices unranked, and rank options >equally. Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired >choices, and ranked below all ranked choices. > >To vote "no, no matter what", rank "None of the above" as more >desirable >than the unacceptable choices, or you may rank the "None of the above" >choice and leave choices you consider unacceptable blank. (Note: if the >"None of the above" choice is unranked, then it is equal to all other >unranked choices, if any -- no special consideration is given to the >"None of the above" choice by the voting software). > >Finally, mail the filled out ballot to: >gr_vote_secr...@vote.debian.org. > >Don't worry about spacing of the columns or any quote characters (">") >that your reply inserts. > >NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP signed) with your key that is >in the Debian keyring. You may, if you wish, choose to send a signed, >encrypted ballot: use the vote key appended below for encryption. > >The voting software (Devotee) accepts mail that either contains only an >unmangled OpenPGP message (RFC 2440 compliant), or a PGP/MIME mail >(RFC 3156 compliant). To avoid problems I suggest you use PGP/MIME. > > >VOTING SECRECY > >This is a non-secret vote. After the voting period is over the details >on >who voted what will be published. During the vote itself the only >information that will be published is who voted. > >You can encrypt your message to the voting system to keep your vote >secret >until the end of the voting period. The software will also try to keep >your vote secret and will encrypt the reply it sends to you. > >VOTING FORM > >- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >6acf7f89-3eb2-492c-8715-98ae65b5f9d2 >[ ] Choice 1: Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote >[ ] Choice 2: Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote >and allow verification >[ ] Choice 3: Reaffirm public voting >[ ] Choice 4: None of the above >- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >BALLOT OPTIONS > > >Choice 1: Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote >================================================================= > >Rationale >========= > >During the vote for GR_2021_002, several developers said they were >uncomfortable voting because under the process at that time, their name >and ballot ranking would be public. >A number of participants in the discussion believe that we would get >election results that more accurately reflect the will of the >developers >if we do not make the name associated with a particular vote on the >tally sheet public. >Several people believed that the ranked votes without names attached >would still be valuable public information. > >This proposal would treat all elections like DPL elections. >At the same time it relaxes the requirement that the secretary must >conduct a vote via email. If the requirement for email voting is >removed, then an experiment is planned at least with the belenios >voting >system [1]. belenios may provide better voter secrecy and an easier >web-based voting system than our current email approach. >If this proposal passes, adopting such an alternative >would require sufficient support in the project but would not require >another constitutional amendment. > > [1]: https://lists.debian.org/yhotrixtz3aip...@roeckx.be > >This proposal increases our reliance on the secretary's existing power >to decide how votes are conducted. The lack of an override mechanism >for secretary decisions about how we conduct votes has not been a >problem so far. However, if we are going to rely on this power to >consider questions like whether the project has sufficient consensus to >adopt an alternate voting mechanism, we need an override mechanism. >So, this proposal introduces such a mechanism. > >Summary of Changes >================== > > 1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote > public. > > 2) Do not require that votes be conducted by email. > > 3) Clarify that the developers can replace the secretary at any time. > > 4) Provide a procedure for overriding the decision of the project > secretary or their delegate. Overriding the decision of what super > majority is required or overriding the determination of election > outcome requires a 3:1 majority. The chair of the technical committee > ><h3>4.2. Procedure</h3> >@@ -228,9 +246,10 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed >later.</cite></p> > <p> > Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes, tallies, and > results are not revealed during the voting period; after the > vote the Project Secretary lists all the votes {+cast in sufficient >detail that anyone may verify the outcome of the election from the >votes cast. >The+} >{+ identity of a developer casting a particular vote is not >made+} >{+ public, but developers will be given an option to confirm >their vote >is included in the votes+} cast. The voting period is 2 weeks, but may >be >varied by up > to 1 week by the Project Leader. > </p> > </li> > >@@ -247,7 +266,7 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed >later.</cite></p> > </li> > > <li> > <p>Votes are cast[-by email-] in a manner suitable to the Secretary. > The Secretary determines for each poll whether voters can change > their votes.</p> > </li> >@@ -371,8 +390,7 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed >later.</cite></p> > necessary.</li> > > <li>The next two weeks are the polling period during which > Developers may cast their votes. [-Votes in leadership elections are-] >[- kept secret, even after the election is finished.</li>-]{+</li>+} > > <li>The options on the ballot will be those candidates who have > nominated themselves and have not yet withdrawn, plus None Of The > > > >Choice 2: Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion >period >======================================================================== > >Rationale >========= > >Give the opportunity to vote for secret voting without needing to >additionally vote for unrelated/only slightly related >constitution changes; >for example for the change of mode of voting >from email to something not defined. > >As it was mentioned in the discussion, >there might be no consensus on which options are direcly related - >This option regards the need to allow verification (6)) >as directly related to secret votes, because otherwise >they would become completely unverifiable. > >Summary of Changes >================== > >1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote > public. > >6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification > of the outcome given the votes cast and must permit developers to > confirm their vote is included in the votes cast. > > ><h3>4.2. Procedure</h3> >@@ -228,9 +246,10 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed >later.</cite></p> > <p> > Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes, tallies, and > results are not revealed during the voting period; after the >vote the Project Secretary lists all the votes {+cast in sufficient >detail that anyone may verify the outcome of the election from the >votes cast. The+} >{+ identity of a developer casting a particular vote is not >made+} >{+ public, but developers will be given an option to confirm that >their vote is included in the votes+} cast. > >@@ -371,8 +390,7 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed >later.</cite></p> > necessary.</li> > > <li>The next two weeks are the polling period during which > Developers may cast their votes. [-Votes in leadership elections are-] >[- kept secret, even after the election is finished.</li>-]{+</li>+} > > >Choice 3: Reaffirm public voting >================================ > >Since we can either have secret and intransparent voting, or we can >have >open and transparent voting, the project resolves to leave our voting >system as it is. > >Rationale: > >The GR proposal for secret voting is silent on implenentation details, >probably because secret and transparent voting is, well, impossible to >achieve fully, so this GR is bound to a similar fate as the 'publish >debian-private' vote, which was voted for and then was never >implemented. > >A voting system which is transparent only to some, is undemocratic and >will lead to few people in the know, which is diagonal to Debians goals >of openness and transparency. > >And then, early 2022 is not the time for rushed changes like this, >which >is also why I explicitly want to see "keep the status quo" on the >ballot, >and not only as "NOTA", but as a real option. > >Choice 4: None of the above >=========================== > >This is the default option. Rank this option higher than the >unacceptable >choices. > > >VOTE RESULTS > >The responses to a valid vote shall be signed by the vote key created >for this vote. The public key for the vote, signed by the Project >secretary, is appended below. > >-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > >mQINBGIs0tMBEACuLjJ6zBlCT9+nvzQdhZuuxg9ECSYZu8z0ZJ3RnqMkpw+45Riv >jmxlOC6bbkFloRdDrhNTIFFgdp92/sFnWwd0rQ6SvZbVGjiaXTggO4gIoXWGCJyd >QGNAeUp7DIoORTok1HanzmSue0xJU+rZRUk3ACbN7hrlw1wC9UcOX2pptVeubcVL >fh/iZL6TJlgcZT5mWTpt1qkNHh/Y2uPIafzGmOWSM7AithGDEtw3MaGdH9hli7qo >zgx+3CcZBIAI+bHb9Xfnx3b1qRmC6kFOpETBbzBDz1g66xlSu8aYM1ldIgiDSyip >2GICxmNzCB5LvdQ6wxCMuzRg/a8hYYwbNpdxpzvMbJkqMqPTpCncmxwZR7w6eo9b >U1Rab6ILyIjrFn7UrkIYSKnPG8muI0OCgMJcecx9s/r2MVphQKnA0/H/+HHJ19KV >aWfnxqVnT/DbeKWMLYyv0A8+anownroHmhUOJUB5vbJV4qEWLnFMQ9lkxra2esZF >voGgk9+hXgPjcNz3D+lK51is0x6MBYqlfa32YrzbP+vrYws1j8+V+d2bbxQ5pNMs >B3IAqCLJxWTMIFAAl4ENu/R+kgdHJYkTAADO+puv/LA5DtvSwnswhPMEsenjROi4 >bJMmOfapGPlRBzD038K+d8Dt/wtyf/V1tm+GopUB/YaQ9l8BQZBshOgFgQARAQAB >tDBWb3Rpbmcgc2VjcmVjeSA8Z3Jfdm90ZV9zZWNyZWN5QHZvdGUuZGViaWFuLm9y >Zz6JAj4EEwEIACgFAmIs0tMCGwMFCQAbr4AGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4B >AheAAAoJEIibeWkr1bTjVqYP/3ra2wGH/L5TWI2ohEkvFmg53/NAE33wmgjtjnbU >tZkEQPWvCbeg6iJKgk7O4AAx9XgUu0HFRY+FQSN4lsC+SyaG53WQ9baDGia6jc4Y >iHMgELdOPNC47yp4qC30AV6nBptjjJv2QyYq8gOej/I2hSf5YtpdnA7Q3lsymA9E >+iPIcV1QO9IX0WU3+6Hu3PP7rKugJTsM1YjlrOzjHB3WAPyngw38drcIxBc/d7Uy >1FRD/l2I5SBvRPOEiZH/2hZXbeT1yQkphwTVpHfsBtkPxnv5ERILBWRVOW5lKcg4 >yyXASzkbngaIbfacgC0b17WfEvX+yeKWFAeEn2/A0uRrVkgjY1yT7kfFq8OFNqRc >v9FW3PQDG6pFMKdtvzaI0PMujclXhtp29FzHqBGdLiOuJgn6qJ0IfUoKPtGR7J6o >AiB7ojGH14wiXxWJA8cQpyxz1+6x3bCvxlDU+TW3qn1WNYDON+1USVpwOvUct8ru >jn2a2OoFYxI2gun1ZPuqQdhHyTKuVhNJ5674NlmBVGG1YlQWQVxElEreMkqUdS17 >w8CjNEu+yCkl3dsQuZLdOrIcgEqSZt22i6HA5hldWD8JiJ46iMsEZIfYelqHBuDe >J+OmT4PR0Q/klrwA3Jq06xEr/o2RvDzzvT39KW4QBOVZiQPwLV/8BIQ/TDqoIvoI >NjoyiQIzBBABCgAdFiEE5eUlYN2RxVbdvaXQIGTFNkHCXl0FAmIs0yoACgkQIGTF >NkHCXl2QpQ/8CHQeNMwzDqxu6mR9wrOuM37J5QoHX1wUbr5yXVqOXpVjPHLvbRWW >OVf798x+jQ92NFUi1ANYn2nr9Fgtp0YNkpX3w8nd32j3SivtB1+TeoFXJbvtJbT+ >F3KI0X63FTFiuNLU3rcupO+b78jRO3awJnxw3eiWM6KGAraE146mqVIk5PBJFF0h >RJkg+GK5SLZ0otRpNAquoN6HcX9ToLGc2HlDL8S4IWVqFKPh8R8Eb6RbKEjM4htj >2azL06CCHZlACrg3I68zO9bhRXdwbyOzbQ6M3jymvSqJl0fB9DTDAFzaG1LhF+00 >ghXqqJeAexQzcN5tZ0Xc4ZZfNFjvGBVmBoucHHO11L2CwNZPzH2DrLPuH6KzsmoE >wq/XHiLAonqHIsc/YM32l98v+8Ro1LreyGqc1KYKvKnvlDg1C3KKK6ObcDsL02IL >yw2Ksu4ZJLv73aqOjw/B04Qyf82JKVGkmVe7FwjjsZLDDrH1ZcZ03g2057Du0A/r >2bm6Y6+dmYyrjWfKmAVJRbPHttnt7T2OUJSg8oThBBe3FKTq5O1i5Vba+cjHP/QR >YLZtumRi9JdACs6VI6KcJbf7rvTd6NcOp3NNjog5NgjAhuVjTQAi5364QAlYO2q/ >7KA/UlciI2jyYOu5oirFeOGLCo98rqeoIi+tf7whXT6z+cqCvcv0L/+5Ag0EYizS >0wEQAMi+pNlhNpgmUW8NGNKowBbj1HjZnSMNCeuJl4J0pit6WzF6ulLY0uuA9rEu >/EO46tGU2iHu1QzLTmtpj480mm9FPLiJAv8dooKRCyjdkR9hw33iCZSI/u8pKI1i >+EbovJEVVvX2g5ci1cMQ7G8uRhC3GQ/63yBiWQ6OT+retorKFAnQY14S1i8r8eU1 >gEuTOJsUU/J8XylrMOSSfkU5NnyE9fZzB07+1e8mrsXlq9qQhntcdCQ46q7f87vw >iG5gzdXhy7tYpNHUd9syZyQMTYxxq4gaU8B9cHX5RUFqvwTR9WqBrv8qMeWNzZbg >IYnVCyS6f44lWtyopSUSw5aAOwYyYyIfIL9iym1rRJqReIUYA5fT5kSchbR9LUAI >Pfo/mZII8uCqirD+l3cDn9syiuATW5ubnVlCGWLFdbtZkrPmwU7n38Q7YrZK59o7 >cHR1lQ5qwim5B0fF90Qo/nRgwOk4fWNxhlwMCdUoeHtoAZSmuDPK8oDp6SqVdxaW >Qrsx2hnG6rKoclVMwTyEyNazcDaq9ZzMlIFRArw791J/lK3MtxnsXz3t2vonbEe1 >mvblJ8celOd3NwZU1JDtJxSrNXgI1YJxtyu53m3rlWE7G9/s7JrEpS1fbyDux+Uo >dWc8LifnOD/AKKINNM0mJOyfcZa9wg1/rtyKMJ1zgHkZA25RABEBAAGJAiUEGAEI >AA8FAmIs0tMCGwwFCQAbr4AACgkQiJt5aSvVtOONlBAAqbbaZ3+iVNxppqjxB3+Q >/v/olcD2OHBT7qRG5Lflkg/NucjxfF/6OGcRk2dX4kRxefEBG1B2gLsbrUKXnPCP >Z97ElV5OuMXOrWmYa8XYLLK3nee/b5wxAKQp60qhcD7qdmWigAnZXOLhZjeRsRym >QsC2Zqs4vRFKKgZ+SftMRIZ1C9lLXeaWvyZm+szxUz6v82hpwVhHMirJCBa+DM/b >WXwOnlEF7j/8M1noMzUJaYXXOYVHjJSCJkWV4vvlVwKp1MNKdbYwq7jKHZxdxBMB >y9w4TReIlNYLgaGzo94rBA9MVF4OOniLjEHZKx303IOSFqZlnFtEAHZUGON6uVBC >40nISOGgLON2BKej8kRR+5u46m1x7mleeX0cUMLZGTvTNSfgedpCaGGcyWXRTJjh >Nl/tEb6FJ5n2YAmNg7rx6EgGw7KcGzhLwcEIhess4zAjjOMYMXsG+xHe8jLMMA+v >dl/h62M+KKWne7zTraPvruPfSNazi4dZ+OQSGd1IU7THIQeLzPQy3xmaGODCT2Rb >rgG5a3UmG3beq8INyM32dTCPBdaylVEvHCFV7pLJQqV4rbsjI4y1Pj80Q1nKAWd6 >KaEdm9RLst8dlGr/yqF2eKW6Anrq0BnIk2P+1WUNT6kYw3uR54zEMJsEyHhGthHv >rBx9Eic2hgSnl4hB+jxtJJ0= >=anKA >-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
