Re: Regarding the NEW queue (Was: Re: NEW queue backing up again -- ftpmasters, any explanation or comment?)

2006-03-15 Thread Micah Anderson
On 2006-03-13, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nobody mailed ftpmaster@ about the size of the NEW queue. -devel isn't > a contact address for ftp-master, at least speaking for myself, > mailinglists have a much lower priority than things like ftpmaster mail, > and when backlogg

Re: Regarding the NEW queue (Was: Re: NEW queue backing up again -- ftpmasters, any explanation or comment?)

2006-03-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Lars Wirzenius wrote: > ma, 2006-03-13 kello 14:59 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti: >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: >> > Is there a reason why the question should be made in private? >> >> It seems as if only problems and annoyances end up on mailinglists

Re: Regarding the NEW queue (Was: Re: NEW queue backing up again -- ftpmasters, any explanation or comment?)

2006-03-13 Thread Lars Wirzenius
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 14:59 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > Is there a reason why the question should be made in private? > > It seems as if only problems and annoyances end up on mailinglists, and > *not* to [EMAIL PROTE

Regarding the NEW queue (Was: Re: NEW queue backing up again -- ftpmasters, any explanation or comment?)

2006-03-13 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month > > ago. > > Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split? Different peo