Hi,
would it be possible to clarify the title of this post by adding for
which distribution it is about: "testing" or "unstable" ? I guess it
is for "unstable", but packages in "unstable" are not meant to be
released, only packages in "testing".
Even if "testing" does not import packages with R
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:02:40PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
> >> Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST)
> >>
> >> Total number of release-critical bugs: 482
> >
> >I thought aj i
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
>> Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST)
>>
>> Total number of release-critical bugs: 482
>
>I thought aj introduced the "serious" severity so that "important" bugs
>wouldn't be consi
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> I thought aj introduced the "serious" severity so that "important" bugs
> wouldn't be considered release-critical anymore, but it looks like bugscan
> doesn't know that important bugs aren't RC.
Thanks, fixed:
@priorities = ("serious", "grave", "critic
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:00:08AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
> Bug stamp-out list for Jan 5 05:13 (CST)
>
> Total number of release-critical bugs: 482
I thought aj introduced the "serious" severity so that "important" bugs
wouldn't be considered release-critical anymore, but it looks like b
5 matches
Mail list logo