* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050401 23:35]:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
...
Major changes in etch
-
If you intend to make major changes (like a C++ ABI bump) during the
development of etch, please speak with the release team
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:15:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050401 23:35]:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
...
Major changes in etch
-
If you intend to make major changes (like a C++ ABI
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Why do you need to know about all transitions this month if Debian 3.2
is scheduled for the end of 2006 or 2007?
... so that the release team can plan ahead a bit?
Gee.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud --
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:17:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Why do you need to know about all transitions this month if Debian 3.2
is scheduled for the end of 2006 or 2007?
... so that the release team can plan ahead a bit?
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:50:53 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:17:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Why do you need to know about all transitions this month if Debian 3.2
is scheduled for the end of 2006 or
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's also funny that people want debian to release so bad, and yet fight
the release team at every announcement. I don't see a problem with
wanting to know as much about transitions and migrations in advance as
possible. I'm sure there will be
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:35:55AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't need to be an exact date, but someting like
third quarter of 2005 or mid-2008 would help to avoid situations
like the sarge C++ transition that was too early [1] or the more
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check the facts:
gcc 3.4 has a different C++ ABI compared to gcc 3.2/3.3 on _all_
architectures [1].
I'm sorry, you're completely right. I must have been thinking of 3.3.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello world,
Let's take a break from talking about etch plans to talk about sarge
again, shall we?
Debian Installer RC3, kernels
-
The RC3 release of the debian-installer has been published. As Joey
Hess mentions in his announcement[0], this has been the
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Debian Installer RC3, kernels
-
The RC3 release of the debian-installer has been published. As Joey
Hess mentions in his announcement[0], this has been the best-tested
Debian Installer release
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:32:25 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Debian Installer RC3, kernels
-
The RC3 release of the debian-installer has been published. As Joey
Hess mentions in his announcement[0],
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With these changes done, we are now on the home stretch for the sarge
release. We are now only waiting on the arm buildds to recover and
catch up to a reasonable extent, and on one last glibc upload -- and
then sarge is FREEZING. This is, therefore,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
...
Major changes in etch
-
If you intend to make major changes (like a C++ ABI bump) during the
development of etch, please speak with the release team as soon as
possible, describing the changes you're
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't need to be an exact date, but someting like
third quarter of 2005 or mid-2008 would help to avoid situations
like the sarge C++ transition that was too early [1] or the more than
two years old X11 that will ship with sarge (and that doesn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
