On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:05:24PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> > and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> > plan?
>
Holger Levsen wrote:
>btw, google has no (good) hits for "sarge releasenotes", but for "sarge
>release notes" they have... maybe this helps.
>
>
Try "sarge release notes"
- Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not? Isn't
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-upgradingpackages
> sufficient?
the document suggests:
,
| aptitude -f --with-suggests --with-recommends dist-upgrade
`
but
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:05:24PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> > and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> > plan?
>
Quoting Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> > and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> > plan?
>
> Why is this a worthwhile use of a release
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> plan?
Can you tell me about the usefulness of whining[1] about release policy
for year
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> plan?
Why is this a worthwhile use of a release manager's time? How about we
analyse the release /after/ we
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:46:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>...
> 30 May 2005
> Release
>
> And if everything goes well, we'll be ready to release at the end of the
> month.
>...
Setting goals is the easy part of release management.
Ensuring that the goals are met is the hard part of th
Hi Javier,
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 13:49, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > This might be related to the fact the they're somewhat hidden, at least
> > to ./google "sarge releasenotes" -
> > http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes isn't helpful atm
> > either.
> Why not? Isn't
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:23:25AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> This might be related to the fact the they're somewhat hidden, at least
> to ./google "sarge releasenotes" -
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes isn't helpful atm either.
Why not? Isn't
http://www.debian.org/r
> Hagan sus apuestas: Sarge saldrá en...
Puf, yo no apuesto, que trae mala suerte (es algo infundado socialmente, es
una autosupersticion, fruto de mis delirios, pero siempre que apuesto algo,
me pasa algo malo en pocos dias)
eso si, me permito un:
WWWHHAA
Package: www.debian.org
Hi,
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 21:46, Steve Langasek posted a fine mail about a fine
change (thanks for both to whom it may apply).
Whohoo! :-)
Regarding testing upgrades from woody, I would like to propose mentioning
more visible that the suggested upgrade tool is aptitud
12 matches
Mail list logo
