On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 23:08:26 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since version 2.6.0-4, fontconfig includes a trigger that will re-run
> fc-cache whenever needed.
>
> Therefore, all font packages that currently do this in the postinst are
> strongly advised to remove these calls. The pe
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:08:26 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I’ve requested a new lintian check, and here is the list of affected
> packages.
>
> Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP)
>ttf-dejima-mincho (U)
>ttf-kanjistrokeorders (U)
>ttf-kiloji (U)
>ttf-kochi (U)
>ttf-konatu (U)
>
Or at least nice(1) those calls.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533019
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org):
> The next paragraph said:
> I’ve requested a new lintian check, and here is the list of
> affected packages.
/me slaps self. Sorry, Joss, for overreading your mail. I actually
went back on it quickly after you forwarded it to pkg-fonts
Le lundi 15 juin 2009 à 17:59 +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org):
> > Hi,
> >
> > since version 2.6.0-4, fontconfig includes a trigger that will re-run
> > fc-cache whenever needed.
> >
> > Therefore, all font packages that currently do this in the pos
Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> since version 2.6.0-4, fontconfig includes a trigger that will re-run
> fc-cache whenever needed.
>
> Therefore, all font packages that currently do this in the postinst are
> strongly advised to remove these calls. The performance gains durin
2009/6/14 Josselin Mouette :
> Re-running fc-cache used to be done by defoma, but people kept adding
> fc-cache calls manually. They turned out to have been right, since
> defoma support was ripped out of fontconfig a while ago.
It was? I still see this file in the fontconfig package (2.6.0-3):
Le samedi 13 juin 2009 à 14:14 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Strangely, most of the font packages on my system appear to have
> autogenerated postinst snippets for defoma from dh_installdefoma, but
> there's no equivalent for fc-cache which has been added everywhere by hand.
> Should there be a
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:08:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> since version 2.6.0-4, fontconfig includes a trigger that will re-run
> fc-cache whenever needed.
> Therefore, all font packages that currently do this in the postinst are
> strongly advised to remove these calls. The performance
Hi,
since version 2.6.0-4, fontconfig includes a trigger that will re-run
fc-cache whenever needed.
Therefore, all font packages that currently do this in the postinst are
strongly advised to remove these calls. The performance gains during
upgrades should be huge.
I’ve requested a new lintian c
10 matches
Mail list logo
