Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-11 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2011-03-10, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: buildd in unstable was severely broken for ages, because the packages weren't at all tested after heavy refactorings (and still aren't because the maintainer doesn't have a test setup). wanna-build will have suffered the same fate. The

Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-11 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2011-03-10, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: But neither are particularly ideal. They originated as flat-file Perl MLDBM databases which were later upgraded to use PostgreSQL, but due to the interface imposed upon them by the historic design are really not that well suited to the

Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-10 Thread Roger Leigh
sbuild (sbuild.git) builds packages for sbuild, wanna-build and buildd. Of these, only sbuild and buildd are actively maintained. The wanna-build instance used on the buildds is maintained independently in a separate wanna-build.git repository. Given that wanna-build in sbuild.git is not

Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2011-03-10, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: This mail is really just to find out: is anyone actually using the wanna-build package in the archive? Given that I know bits of the sbuild.git codebase: Try to run it. If it doesn't immediately explode there might be users. If it does

Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-10 Thread Hector Oron
Hello Roger, 2011/3/10 Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net: This mail is really just to find out: is anyone actually using the wanna-build package in the archive?  popcon indicates that a few people have it installed, and 10 have ever used it.  Would migrating to wanna-build.git be realistic

Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2011-03-10, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote: I was planning to start using a wanna-build instance, but i was not sure which one to use. As I have not yet started to use any of them I have no real objection for its removal, on the other hand I would not mind to try to merge current

Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-10 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 03/10/2011 06:56 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: On 2011-03-10, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote: I was planning to start using a wanna-build instance, but i was not sure which one to use. As I have not yet started to use any of them I have no real objection for its removal, on the other

Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2011-03-10, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote: On 03/10/2011 06:56 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: On 2011-03-10, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote: I was planning to start using a wanna-build instance, but i was not sure which one to use. As I have not yet started to use any of them I have

Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-10 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 05:24:25PM +, Hector Oron wrote: Hello Roger, 2011/3/10 Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net: This mail is really just to find out: is anyone actually using the wanna-build package in the archive?  popcon indicates that a few people have it installed, and 10

Re: Removal of wanna-build from sbuild

2011-03-10 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 07:57:44PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: On 2011-03-10, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote: On 03/10/2011 06:56 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: On 2011-03-10, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote: I was planning to start using a wanna-build instance, but i was not sure