On 29.09.2013 07:34, Bob Tracy wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:32:05AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau
wrote:
> (.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:32:05AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau
> > > wrote:
> > > > (...)
> > > > xserver-xorg-video-sis
>
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > (...)
> > > xserver-xorg-video-sis
> > > (...)
>
> The SiS chipset was, unfortunately, really popular with manufactu
Hey,
Op 28-09-13 17:16, Bob Tracy schreef:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> (...)
>>> xserver-xorg-video-sis
>>> (...)
> The SiS chipset was, unfortunately, really popular with manufacturers of
> relative
Off the top of my head, my Sun E3500 (8x 64-bit SPARC CPUs) has an SBUS
graphics adapter that is one of those cg{N} adapters, but honestly, Linux
support for E3500 is shoddy at best, so it's fine by me.
Patrick
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:2
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > (...)
> > xserver-xorg-video-sis
> > (...)
The SiS chipset was, unfortunately, really popular with manufacturers of
relatively expensive micro PeeCees (EzGo, Jadetec, etc.),
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
> packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
> of them. The reason is they see 0 testing, nobody maintains them
> upstream, if you'r
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:26:22 +0200
Julien Cristau wrote:
> xserver-xorg-video-s3
I'd vote for this one, but I can't maintain it, unfortunately.
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 19:27:37 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 23:26:22 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
> > packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
> > of them.
>
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 23:26:22 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
> packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
> of them.
I assume here you mean maintaining them in Debian (or perhaps upstream
too?)
Hi,
we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
of them. The reason is they see 0 testing, nobody maintains them
upstream, if you're lucky people keep some of them building when APIs
change, if you'r
11 matches
Mail list logo