Patrick Strasser wrote:
schrieb Josselin Mouette am 2011-05-03 17:22:
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit :
Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one
ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler.
Now that's really
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 18:19 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
Where is your RFH bug?
I’m not the maintainer. I’m just one of the guys who happen to upload it
when it gets too outdated.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
schrieb Josselin Mouette am 2011-05-03 17:22:
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit :
Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one
ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler.
Now that's really bad. Alternatives? Reporting
Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:18:45PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
I guess I missed it (wonder how on earth...)
Because you looked at okular first.
True :)
okular uses libpoppler-qt4-3 which depends on libpoppler5.
Even more convoluted for evince.
Absolutely!
--
.''`. Hate's
schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-02 19:20:
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
What would be the right way:
* File two bugs and refer to each other in a additional message
* File one bug and refer
schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-03 15:23:
[..] details in the bug report.
#625452
Patrick
--
Engineers motto: cheap, good, fast: choose any two
Patrick Strasser patrick dot strasser at student dot tugraz dot at
Student of Telemati_cs_, Techn. University Graz, Austria
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit :
schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-03 15:23:
[..] details in the bug report.
#625452
Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one
ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler.
Cheers,
Am 03.05.2011 17:22, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit :
schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-03 15:23:
[..] details in the bug report.
#625452
Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one
ever reads, since
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 17:23 +0200, Patrick Matthäi a écrit :
Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one
ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler.
Which doesn't mean, that there won't be a new maintainer in the future,
who is willed to
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit :
schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-03 15:23:
[..] details in the bug report.
#625452
Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no
Hello!
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
What would be the right way:
* File two bugs and refer to each other in a additional message
* File one bug and refer to the second package
* Something different
Patrick Strasser wrote:
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
Thanks for spotting this bug. Your contribution to Debian is
appreciated.
What would be the right way:
* File two bugs and refer to each other
On 05/02/2011 10:46 PM, Amaya wrote:
Patrick Strasser wrote:
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
Thanks for spotting this bug. Your contribution to Debian is
appreciated.
What would be the right way:
*
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Well, both do use libpoppler5… which is a PDF rendering library.
I knew it! :)
I guess I missed it (wonder how on earth...)
--
.''`. Hate's no fun if you keep it to yourself
: :' : -- The life of David Gale
`. `'
`-Proudly running Debian
Hi,
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:20:12PM +0200, Patrick Strasser wrote:
Hello!
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
What would be the right way:
* File two bugs and refer to each other in a additional
Hi,
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:18:45PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Well, both do use libpoppler5… which is a PDF rendering library.
I knew it! :)
I guess I missed it (wonder how on earth...)
Because you looked at okular first.
okular uses libpoppler-qt4-3 which depends on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 02/05/2011 16:46, Amaya a écrit :
Patrick Strasser wrote:
If d.devel.general is the wrong group, I beg you all pardon and would
be thankful for naming a proper group.
I'm inclined to believe that discussing propper BTS handling does
17 matches
Mail list logo
