Re: Request for testers for new gphoto package

2001-09-12 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, Quoting Paul Slootman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > There's some problem there... Apparently libusb1 was removed a couple of > weeks ago. > > PS: Please send copies to me and not to the list, in order to not clobber > > it (I'm not subscribed so keep that in mind) > To the list anyway to prevent ot

Re: Request for testers for new gphoto package

2001-09-10 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 10 Sep 2001, Paul Slootman wrote: > > However, I can't install your package: Removing the partly installed package also doesn't work well: # dpkg --purge gphoto (Reading database ... 44388 files and directories currently installed.) Removing gphoto ... Purging configuration files for gpho

Re: Request for testers for new gphoto package

2001-09-10 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 09 Sep 2001, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > I would appreciate it if people (with digital cameras) tested this new > version and sent me some feedback regarding its failure/success. Please > take heed that gphoto is a popular package and Anthony asked for no major > changes in pa

Request for testers for new gphoto package

2001-09-08 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
I have just compiled a new version of the gphoto package built from CVS sources (and branded it gphoto-0.6). However, since this is a developer's release I'm not confident enough to substitute the current version of gphoto (0.4.3) in testing/unstable with this even if it includes some new cameras,