Re: Rescue disk crashes with mem=128M or mem=32M or mem=64M

1998-04-27 Thread Chris Fearnley
Hi, Fortunately I got you mail an hour before the install and I was able to try your ideas! Copying ldlinux.sys resulted in "not a boot device" (or somesuch) error. Running the latest syslinux on /dev/fd0 resolved the problem. Thanks! On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 05:38:21PM +0100, Enrique Zanardi w

Re: Rescue disk crashes with mem=128M or mem=32M or mem=64M

1998-04-24 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 11:53:19AM -0400, Chris Fearnley wrote: > Hi, > > The April 11th boot disk crashes when I enter the kernel command line > option "mem=128M" (I also tried mem=32M and mem=64M -- all crashed in the > same way (see below)). > > This system has 128M of RAM, but the BIOS only r

Rescue disk crashes with mem=128M or mem=32M or mem=64M

1998-04-24 Thread Chris Fearnley
Hi, The April 11th boot disk crashes when I enter the kernel command line option "mem=128M" (I also tried mem=32M and mem=64M -- all crashed in the same way (see below)). This system has 128M of RAM, but the BIOS only reports 16M to Linux. When I try to correction this on the boot disk command-li