Hi,
I've seen a number of package maintainer willing to upgrade to major
version of packages at this point in time. Among the disruptive changes
that have been done (or are planned to do):
- Django 1.10: uploaded last august, after I wrote more than 30 patches,
there's still issues, it seems. See
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Thomas,
>...
> Finally, with the above examples as illustration (and please, these
> aren't attacks in any way...), I guess what I'm trying to say here is:
>
> While disruptive changes are necessary evils so we upgrade ever
On 11/05/2016 04:07 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> ...
>> Finally, with the above examples as illustration (and please, these
>> aren't attacks in any way...), I guess what I'm trying to say here is:
>>
>> While disruptive changes are nec
Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes:
> If only all maintainers would coordinate their transitions, too many
> unfortunately don't. And those are unlikely read Thomas' plea either, so
> disruptive library changes caused by uncoordinated transitions are
> unfortunately still likely to happen.
The point o
4 matches
Mail list logo