Op ma, 14-03-2005 te 20:54 -0500, schreef Daniel Jacobowitz:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:51:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Perhaps, but then why not just use the existing testing setup?
Because, as has been explained several times, it doesn't scale.
What are the exact problems?
My main
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:59, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
My main gripe with the proposal, as it currently stands, is that it
provides a solution for problems that haven't been discussed in detail,
without much space for improvements.
I agree. I think there is a spectrum of measures that could
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 02:02, John Goerzen wrote:
Simply making a snapshot -- or posting a set of .debs -- does not make
Debian stable. See #2, for instance.
See below, please.
2) Provides no way for such a stable release to be integrated into the
security build system;
That's
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:06:35PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I am of the opinion that the testing distribution has been a great
help in releasing.
...
Is this just a personal opinion or backed by any objective evaluation?
I'm asking because as I've already expressed my impression is
John Goerzen wrote:
-vote dropped from Cc's, subject changed. Please, can we take some care
over these things?
And the result of this discussion is what leaves me with great concern.
Specifically, the proposal:
1) Provides no way for an arch to produce a stable release after the
initial set
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Halting unstable autobuilding, fixing remaining bugs in an
arch-specific freeze, then making a snapshot allows you to produce a
release. It may or may not correspond with Debian stable.
I am of the opinion that the testing distribution has been a
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:02:37AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
And the result of this discussion is what leaves me with great concern.
Specifically, the proposal:
1) Provides no way for an arch to produce a stable release after the
initial set of archs have produced theirs;
Halting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:02:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Really, I don't really understand all the difficulty of running
apt-get -b source, or pbuilder, or some such for n+1 archs as opposed
to just n. With a little use of ssh keys, the whole thing should be
completely automated. And I
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:14:47PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:02:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Really, I don't really understand all the difficulty of running
apt-get -b source, or pbuilder, or some such for n+1 archs as opposed
to just n. With a little
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:51:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:14:47PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:02:05PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Really, I don't really understand all the difficulty of running
apt-get -b source, or pbuilder, or
10 matches
Mail list logo
