Re: SDL producing bogus dependencies or packages misusing SDL?

2005-12-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:32:00PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I wanted to verify this. I've been looking at a number of packages > which have picked up dependencies on libartsc0, libasound2, libaudio2, > libaudiofile0, libsed0, libjpeg62, libpng12-0, and many others, without > actually build

SDL producing bogus dependencies or packages misusing SDL?

2005-12-05 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I wanted to verify this. I've been looking at a number of packages which have picked up dependencies on libartsc0, libasound2, libaudio2, libaudiofile0, libsed0, libjpeg62, libpng12-0, and many others, without actually build-depending on any of the corresponding dev packages. The common factor is