> On 18 Dec 1997, Kai Henningsen wrote:
>
> > Remember there are people that can't stand Emacs.
>
> Strange... :)
Nothing strange. After a couple of _years_ of struggling in attempts to
learn emacs (I made about 6 attempts total) I found a *great* relief in...
vi (vim actually). I was able to ge
On 18 Dec 1997, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Remember there are people that can't stand Emacs.
Strange... :)
---
Turbo_ /// If there are no Amigas in heaven, send me to HELL!
^\\\/
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it'
> "Kai" == Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kai> Remember there are people that can't stand Emacs.
Bliss. :-)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Maor) wrote on 16.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Perhaps you could point out how I could force all of those people
> > with broken mailers and/or ideas to use one of your great mail
> > clients, so I won't get four, f
On 17 Dec 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> > download them is closing the barn door after the horses have eaten the
> > chickens.
Horses are vegetarians anyway.
Will
--
|
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While I agree that Gnus is the best thing since sliced bread, keep in
> mind those in other countries where net access is *much* more
> expensive.
I hardly think the duplicate messages represent a significant
percentage of their bandwidth.
> For these
Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gnus.
While I agree that Gnus is the best thing since sliced bread, keep in
mind those in other countries where net access is *much* more
expensive. For these people, deleting the duplicates after they
download them is closing the barn door after the horses
On Tue 16 Dec 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > "James" == James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> James> Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes
> >> into the "To:" header and list address (along with all o
"Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps you could point out how I could force all of those people
> with broken mailers and/or ideas to use one of your great mail
> clients, so I won't get four, five, six or more duplicates of the
> messages sent to the list.
Gnus.
--
TO UNS
Quoting Gonzalo A. Diethelm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You seem to be quite happy with the configuration as it is. Good for
> you. Perhaps you could point out how I could force all of those people
> with broken mailers and/or ideas to use one of your great mail
> clients, so I won't get four, five, six
On 17-Dec-1997, James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes into
> > the "To:" header and list address (along with all other thread
> > participant's adresses) to "Cc:" header.
>
> So, umm
> "James" == James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes
>> into the "To:" header and list address (along with all other
>> thread participant's adresses) to "Cc:" he
Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes into
> the "To:" header and list address (along with all other thread
> participant's adresses) to "Cc:" header.
So, umm, fix elm?
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-m
> --- Start of forwarded message ---
> Resent-Date: 16 Dec 1997 22:24:45 -
> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 15:38:16 -0300
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Deb
--- Start of forwarded message ---
Resent-Date: 16 Dec 1997 22:24:45 -
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 15:38:16 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian developers l
On Dec 16, 1997, at 11:22, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Tyson Dowd:
> > A couple of us discussed this (and other problems with the mailing
> > list), in the thread "Duplicate messages on this list" in debian-devel
> > about a week ago and eventually came to a standstill where most people
> > in the di
On 16-Dec-1997, Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please check out http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html . The page
> contains several arguments against the use of "Reply-To". I fully agree to
> what Ian said.
Please don't quote this URL as if all the issues in this web pa
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please check out http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html . The page
> contains several arguments against the use of "Reply-To". I fully agree to
> what Ian said.
I personally find header-munging of any sort distasteful, however
I think a couple
On 16-Dec-1997, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tyson Dowd:
> > A couple of us discussed this (and other problems with the mailing
> > list), in the thread "Duplicate messages on this list" in debian-devel
> > about a week ago and eventually came to a standstill where most people
> > in th
On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> > Please let noone think that just because that absurd and awful
> > suggestion was the last thing anyone said that everyone is happy with
> > it.
> >
> > Rather, the rest of us have more important things to do than to fight
> > battles with people wit
> Please let noone think that just because that absurd and awful
> suggestion was the last thing anyone said that everyone is happy with
> it.
>
> Rather, the rest of us have more important things to do than to fight
> battles with people with broken mailers and broken ideas about how
> mailers ou
Tyson Dowd:
> A couple of us discussed this (and other problems with the mailing
> list), in the thread "Duplicate messages on this list" in debian-devel
> about a week ago and eventually came to a standstill where most people
> in the discussion were happy with the following solution:
>
>
> I would also like to suggest a print or two. I do not know if this
> idea would actually make money, but I would buy one.
Uh-oh, you moved this topic from the other mailing list. Consider your
knuckles rapped :-) No harm done this time, but be careful.
We were discussing t-shirts and such for
On 14 Dec, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> More expected money out:
>
> About $2000 for the 501(c)3 non-profit status. This
> was waiting for all those papers we were fedexing around.
>
> We have an undedicated $2000 to $3000 to spend on Debian and other
> SPI programs. Part of this was supposed to be
24 matches
Mail list logo
