Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Michael Tautschnig] > > Debian's Social Contract says that "Our priorities are our users > > and free software". It does _not_ say that "Debian should tell > > users what is good". Right? > > Would it be appropriate here to propose a corollary to Godwin's Law > involving the first sentence of point 4 of the Debian Social Contract? > I can't think of a snappy name for the corollary, though.
It would not be a corollary, since it doesn't follow logically from Godwin's Law. Perhaps Samuelson's Law, since you're proposing it :-) -- \ “When I was a baby I kept a diary. Recently I was re-reading | `\ it, it said ‘Day 1: Still tired from the move. Day 2: Everybody | _o__) talks to me like I'm an idiot.’” —Steven Wright | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]