Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [Michael Tautschnig]
> > Debian's Social Contract says that "Our priorities are our users
> > and free software". It does _not_ say that "Debian should tell
> > users what is good". Right?
> 
> Would it be appropriate here to propose a corollary to Godwin's Law
> involving the first sentence of point 4 of the Debian Social Contract?
> I can't think of a snappy name for the corollary, though.

It would not be a corollary, since it doesn't follow logically from
Godwin's Law.

Perhaps Samuelson's Law, since you're proposing it :-)

-- 
 \        “When I was a baby I kept a diary. Recently I was re-reading |
  `\   it, it said ‘Day 1: Still tired from the move. Day 2: Everybody |
_o__)                  talks to me like I'm an idiot.’” —Steven Wright |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to