On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 08:15, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> There's the question of botched uploads. I think we've all accidentally
> >> botched an upload one time or another, and having access to auric means
> >> we can fix it without having to call on
Le lun 15/12/2003 à 14:56, Colin Watson a écrit :
> > This is the kind of services that should be available on the web.
> > Making the NEW queue available on the web just like incoming.d.o would
> > also be valuable.
>
> The NEW queue isn't exported for reasons of US crypto regulations. That
> sai
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:51:58PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dim 14/12/2003 à 23:53, Brian May a écrit :
> > Is it still possible to run madison to check what versions of a
> > specific packages are available?
> >
> > I am gussing this isn't possible, but I found it very useful.
>
> Thi
Le dim 14/12/2003 à 23:53, Brian May a écrit :
> Is it still possible to run madison to check what versions of a specific
> packages are available?
>
> I am gussing this isn't possible, but I found it very useful.
This is the kind of services that should be available on the web. Making
the NEW qu
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There's the question of botched uploads. I think we've all accidentally
>> botched an upload one time or another, and having access to auric means
>> we can fix it without having to call on the ftpmasters for help.
> It depends on whether the queue da
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:51:05PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:56, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> > to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> > of discussing inform
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:56, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric,
>
There's the question of botched uploads. I think
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability
* Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-13 15:56]:
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability to check the NEW queue.
>
> Thus, if the ftpmasters are planning on a long-term restriction on
> auric, mirroring the data in the new queue [at least
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability
I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
today is the ability to check the NEW queue.
I frequently add new packages to Debian and, at
12 matches
Mail list logo
