People, please move this thread over to -project
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:13:37AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
> >> > FYI:
> >> > 12:33 < Ganneff> an
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>
>> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
>> > FYI:
>> > 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
>> > clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
> > FYI:
> > 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
> > clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
> > cant sleep (ie 1st -> 2nd june,
[Benjamin Seidenberg]
> FYI:
> 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
> clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
> cant sleep (ie 1st -> 2nd june, 2-> 3) :)
Sounds good, but do not really addresses the fundamental problem here
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:42:16PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>
>> I think it's debconf time and everything is slower, but will be as
>> usual when it's end and everyone came back to his/her normal work.
>>
>
> The point of the first mail was exactly
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:42:16PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> I think it's debconf time and everything is slower, but will be as
> usual when it's end and everyone came back to his/her normal work.
The point of the first mail was exactly about that. NEW queue can't stay
unprocessed j
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:27:26PM +0200, Hans Kroegle wrote:
>It seems that the ftp-masters haven't looked at the NEW queue
> during the last month (or maybe only for java), and its size is still
> increasing (see http://haydn.debian.org/~corsac-guest/new/ ). I agree
> that they may want to ta
Your mail is not about general development of the Debian distribution
and thus rather on topic on debian-project, please follow-up there.
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:27:26PM +0200, Hans Kroegle wrote:
>It seems that the ftp-masters haven't looked at the NEW queue
> during the last month (or may
Hi,
It seems that the ftp-masters haven't looked at the NEW queue
during the last month (or maybe only for java), and its size is still
increasing (see http://haydn.debian.org/~corsac-guest/new/ ). I agree
that they may want to take vacations, but IMHO, NEW is such an
important process for Deb
9 matches
Mail list logo
