On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 07:13:50PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [EMAIL
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:21:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 02:20:27PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Why do you need #497205? Is it too slow to just use SourcePkg() in
the package records object?
Daniel
Sorry! I was lazy/stupid/whatever enough to not read more about apt and
learn how to do it without adding a field to the
Hello,
I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group binary
packages by their source package. However, some packages in the Packages
file do not have a Source field. My guess was to use the package name as
the source package name. Is this right?
Thanks,
Thadeu Cascardo.
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group binary
packages by their source package. However, some packages in the Packages
file do not have a Source field. My guess was to use the package name as
the source package name. Is this
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:21:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group binary
packages by their source package. However, some packages in the Packages
file do not have a Source field. My
5 matches
Mail list logo