On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
OK, but can somebody adjust the spam filtering on
debian-eeepc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
to make it just as spam free as
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Thanks.
And a pony. I suspect the pony is more on-topic here than eepc-devel's
spam
This one time, at band camp, jida...@jidanni.org said:
OK, but can somebody adjust the spam filtering on
debian-eeepc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
to make it just as spam free as
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
I don't know why you insist on thinking -devel has anything to do with
an alioth
OK, but can somebody adjust the spam filtering on
debian-eeepc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
to make it just as spam free as
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
* Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com [091217 15:27]:
I had the ocasion to meet jidanni in one of his talks on bug reporting
[1]. The paper of a bug reporter is not patching or anything else but
point the problem.
100% agreed
I think most of his reports are well written and
provide enough
Hello,
2009/12/17 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 01:03 +0100, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 00:12, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
3. I feel your attitude isn't well suited for an Debian developer. Try
be more helpful instead of sounding like
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored.
The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream.
SG This is isn't actually true
$ GET http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2539/raw |grep
This one time, at band camp, jida...@jidanni.org said:
SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored.
The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream.
SG This is isn't actually true
$ GET http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2539/raw |grep
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 00:12, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
(I don't know why we're having this discussion on -devel, but)
2009-12-07 21:27:19 1NHl6v-0006Ak-OI SA: Action: flagged as Spam but
accepted: score=9.2 required=5.0 (scanned in 5/5 secs | Message-Id:
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 01:03 +0100, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 00:12, Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
(I don't know why we're having this discussion on -devel, but)
2009-12-07 21:27:19 1NHl6v-0006Ak-OI SA: Action: flagged as Spam but
accepted: score=9.2
Re: http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/thread=147634
Thank you all for your attention to this issue and allowing us to
finally find people in charge for
http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/thread=2462
Now what is needed is for the spam threshold
This one time, at band camp, jida...@jidanni.org said:
SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored.
The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream.
This is isn't actually true, so the I've so far ignored the rest of your
mail.
Cheers,
--
SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored.
The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream.
SG This is isn't actually true
$ GET http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2539/raw |grep
X-Spam-Status
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.2 required=5.0
SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored.
The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream.
We have tried over and over to get in touch with anybody in charge.
Maybe somebody reading debian-devel can tell an Alioth administrator.
13 matches
Mail list logo
