The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings
in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc
should be considered serious. See bug #141125 and spamassassin
bug #188.
Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide
policies, but this will be
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings
in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc
should be considered serious. See bug #141125 and spamassassin
bug #188.
It's not a configuration
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings
in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc
should be considered serious. See bug #141125 and spamassassin
bug #188.
Currently, I edit the
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide
policies, but this will be overridden every time spamassassin is
upgraded.
Why not use dpkg-divert?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On 06-Apr-2002 Malcolm Parsons wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide
policies, but this will be overridden every time spamassassin is
upgraded.
Why not use dpkg-divert?
that is obviously
Blars Blarson wrote:
The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings
in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc
should be considered serious. See bug #141125 and spamassassin
bug #188.
If you really must exactly offset amazon's whitelisted score, you can
6 matches
Mail list logo