On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:56:07 -0400
Guido Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We might not want to use policy-rc.d as is in sysvinit of filerc
during startup but we might consider moving these policy decisions
no I don't want this daemon at startup, yes I want that daemon
reloaded after resume
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:58:26PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Franklin PIAT wrote:
I haven't investigated it, but I wonder if it isn't the sane way to have
complex dependency (à la LSB) stored in one place, and system admin
preference in another place.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
Why don't we let sysv-init (at least optionally) use policy-rc.d?
Because that would make policy-rc.d and invoke-rc.d useless crap.
The DESIGN behind invoke-rc.d and policy-rc.d is to help MAINTAINER SCRIPTS
don't screw up when
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:02:39AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
Why don't we let sysv-init (at least optionally) use policy-rc.d?
Because that would make policy-rc.d and invoke-rc.d useless crap.
The DESIGN behind invoke-rc.d and
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
The DESIGN behind invoke-rc.d and policy-rc.d is to help MAINTAINER SCRIPTS
don't screw up when restarting/starting/stopping services automatically,
either in the normal system context, or inside special chroots.
They are NOT, and I repeat:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:42:35 +0200, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also the option to install file-rc and just edit
/etc/runlevel.conf with an editor if you don't want to cope
with the symlink hell.
That's how I have been doing things for years, but that's going to be
incompatible
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:24:46 +0200
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:42:35 +0200, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also the option to install file-rc and just edit
/etc/runlevel.conf with an editor if you don't want to cope
with the symlink hell.
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:21:44 +0800
Lightning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you should use the rcconf to disable the services
apt-get install rcconf
But that surely isn't the standard way, 'cause otherwise the package
wouldn't be priority optional.
Thanks for all the suggestions, I know that
On 28-Jul-08, 20:58 (CDT), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, policy-rc.d is obeyed by invoke-rc.d, and therefore, by all maintainer
scripts.
But manually trying to run the initscript will still work.
Which is a *good* thing, which is why I detest the growing habit
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 10:40 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 a 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a ecrit
:
quite often I
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Franklin PIAT wrote:
I haven't investigated it, but I wonder if it isn't the sane way to have
complex dependency (à la LSB) stored in one place, and system admin
preference in another place.
Well, policy-rc.d is obeyed by invoke-rc.d, and therefore, by all maintainer
you should use the rcconf to disable the services
apt-get install rcconf
在 2008-07-26六的 13:18 +0200，Harald Braumann写道：
Hi,
quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
Many services have a file in /etc/defaults,
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:27:27 +0200
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 01:21:45PM +0200, Harald Braumann wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:27:27 +0200
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a
Hi Hans,
* Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-26 17:17]:
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2008 schrieb Harald Braumann:
[...]
sysv-rc-conf would be one option, in which case it would have to have
priority required. The other option being removing the executable bit.
I would be content with
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
The standard way is to remove the
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
The standard way is
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 02:11:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 13:18 +0200, Harald Braumann a écrit :
quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
* Harald Braumann:
quite often I just want to disable a service in /etc/init.d. But there
doesn't seem to be a standard way to do that.
I usually put exit 0 near the top of the init script. The symlink
stuff is far too brittle.
I haven't tried Nico's suggestion to use file-rc; if it works,
19 matches
Mail list logo
