Re: Status of Sarge Release Issues (Updated for June)

2003-06-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:31:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:38:47PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > 2 ocaml status? > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg00986.html > > and bug 187155. Done? > > Done! OCaml 3.06 has successfu

Re: Status of Sarge Release Issues (Updated for June)

2003-06-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 09:19:19PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Stock OpenOffice seem to be able to embedd java applets into > > documents. RedHat nuked this. > > And we can't do the same because ... ??? We have done that (as Jan wrote.) Building n

Re: Status of Sarge Release Issues (Updated for June)

2003-06-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > 2 i386 libc support? (The large thread starting with > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg01895.html > and going into the May archive talks about this). Do we have to wait for > upstream to fix this? We want to stay compatible with othe

Status of Sarge Release Issues (Updated for June)

2003-06-02 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
I didn't have much of a chance to update this report to be accurate to more than from a few days ago, but here it is as I'll likely be busy for the next few days. I'll try to post another message updating this stuff again next month. Note I haven't included the latest apt translation announcement o