Re: Subversion / swig1.3

2004-10-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
* John Lenz [Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:02:43 +]: > On 10/26/04 16:35:35, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > >On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:39:15PM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote: > >> subversion depends on swig >= 1.3.22-2 which is in unstable. but it's > >not > >> in testing yet because swig cannot be put into testi

Re: Subversion / swig1.3

2004-10-26 Thread John Lenz
On 10/26/04 16:35:35, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:39:15PM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote: > subversion depends on swig >= 1.3.22-2 which is in unstable. but it's not > in testing yet because swig cannot be put into testing because it would > break subversion 1.0.6-2 ;-) > did I mi

Re: Subversion / swig1.3

2004-10-26 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:39:15PM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote: > subversion depends on swig >= 1.3.22-2 which is in unstable. but it's not > in testing yet because swig cannot be put into testing because it would > break subversion 1.0.6-2 ;-) > did I miss something or is this just a bug in the tes

Subversion / swig1.3

2004-10-26 Thread Segreto
subversion depends on swig >= 1.3.22-2 which is in unstable. but it's not in testing yet because swig cannot be put into testing because it would break subversion 1.0.6-2 ;-) did I miss something or is this just a bug in the testing script and needs manual hinting? philipp

Subversion / swig1.3

2004-10-26 Thread Philipp Hug
subversion depends on swig >= 1.3.22-2 which is in unstable. but it's not in testing yet because swig cannot be put into testing because it would break subversion 1.0.6-2 ;-) did I miss something or is this just a bug in the testing script and needs manual hinting? philipp