>As you stated, there's a dependency on a new serf before subversion can
>be updated. That is the reason subversion has not yet been updated.
>
>I hadn't updated the bug until recently because a) it's not an urgent
>problem that 1.8.x isn't in the archive yet and b) I've been rather
>busy
>with
oh ;) thanks for your checking!
1 more note: scons doc states that if you want to install package in a
"sandbox" for packaging, you should better supply real PREFIX=/usr, and
then supply --install-sandbox=./debian/tmp option to 'scons
install'. Don't know if it actually affects something
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> As the latest packaged Subversion in Debian is now 1.8.4 and it seems
> that the maintainer doesn't care updating it by now (see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725787), I've recently
> pa
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:45:07 +0400
vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
> just 1 note: you have a typo -
> "overrdie_dh_auto_clean" :)
oh ;) thanks for your checking!
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-deve
Also I did serf update as Bug#716793, please
dget
http://www.mithril-linux.org/~henrich/debian/package/temp/serf_1.3.2-0.1.dsc
and check it, too.
I've actually already seen it... But it was after I've built it by
myself... :)
It seems your package has cleaner debian/rules so I would prefer
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:39:07 +0400
Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> As the latest packaged Subversion in Debian is now 1.8.4 and it seems
> that the maintainer doesn't care updating it by now (see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725787), I've recently
> packaged svn 1.8.4 and serf 1
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> I couldn't send a email to pe...@p12n.org - his mail server says "552
> Rejected due to spam content (#5.7.1)".
>
> Are there any other ways of communicating to him?
His LDAP information indicates IRC:
https://db.debian.org/search.cgi?u
Yes, someone needs to review it, but before that the package tests
need to be fixed so they a) run and b) pass, reliably and repeatably.
After that, either get the package maintainers to discuss the new
version, or find someone to take over the package if they no longer
want to or can maintain it
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> As the latest packaged Subversion in Debian is now 1.8.4 and it seems
> that the maintainer doesn't care updating it by now (see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725787),
A little over a month ago is not long e
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> I've never tried to perform any package maintenance, but I would be very
> happy to contribute these packages to Debian... (NMU?)
>
> What are the next steps for it? Should someone (some maintainer?) review
> it?
Yes, someone n
Hello everyone!
As the latest packaged Subversion in Debian is now 1.8.4 and it seems
that the maintainer doesn't care updating it by now (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725787), I've recently
packaged svn 1.8.4 and serf 1.3.2 (which is needed by svn) by myself.
I've neve
11 matches
Mail list logo
