On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Brian May [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +1000]:
Adeodate Also, do you remember having root
Adeodato bzr as root?
Huh?
Sorry, that should have read: do you remember having *run* bzr as root.
It's the most likely cause for those .pyc
Le dimanche 27 août 2006 à 19:12 +0200, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
bzrtools 0.9 does not put files under /usr/lib/python2.4, since it
uses python-support; and its maintainer scripts for 0.9 did not
bytecompile the modules, so the most plausible explanation for .pyc
files in /usr/lib/python2.4
Adeodato == Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Robert Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
Robert 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
Robert take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.
Did I do something
Version: 0.9-1
* Brian May [Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:43:24 +1000]:
Robert Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
Robert 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
Robert take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.
Did I do something wrong?
Adeodato == Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Adeodato Hm. I'd say that you have .pyc files left in:
Adeodato
Adeodato /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools
Adeodato Can you check, please?
Yes, see below.
Adeodate Also, do you
* Brian May [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +1000]:
Adeodate Also, do you remember having root
Adeodato bzr as root?
Huh?
Sorry, that should have read: do you remember having *run* bzr as root.
It's the most likely cause for those .pyc files to be there, since
bzrtools did not.
Thanks,
Adeodato == Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Adeodato Sorry, that should have read: do you remember having
Adeodato *run* bzr as root. It's the most likely cause for
Adeodato those .pyc files to be there, since bzrtools did not.
No - I don't recall running
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
appears to be converted successfully - if I do a diff
operation, it reports all files as deleted, but if
* Brian May [Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:53:01 +1000]:
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
appears to be converted successfully - if I do a diff
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:28:58PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006, David Nusinow wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:56:44PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* David Nusinow [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:37:23 +]:
(I'm seriously
interested in setting up git.debian.org for
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
appears to be converted successfully - if I do a diff
operation, it reports all files as deleted, but
la, 2006-08-12 kello 15:59 +1000, Brian May kirjoitti:
Are there any Debian packages of 0.9rc1 available?
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/bzr says 0.9~rc1-1.
(Lookup time: about ten seconds. :)
--
On a clear disk, you seek forever.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006, David Nusinow wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:56:44PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* David Nusinow [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:37:23 +]:
(I'm seriously
interested in setting up git.debian.org for XSF work, for example*),
* If anyone else is interested in this,
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 15:59 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
appears to be converted successfully - if I do a
Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
On Mon, 31.07.2006 at 14:54:50 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
With cdbs as negative and alitoh/svn as positive?
what are your problems with CDBS?
Best,
--Toni++
Lets just have a short comment. For more search the
Hi,
On Mon, 07.08.2006 at 12:52:26 +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.07.1126 +0100]:
what are your problems with CDBS?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00451.html
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:02:15AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 07.08.2006 at 12:52:26 +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
also sprach Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.07.1126 +0100]:
what are your problems with CDBS?
Hi,
On Mon, 31.07.2006 at 14:54:50 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With cdbs as negative and alitoh/svn as positive?
what are your problems with CDBS?
Best,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
also sprach Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.07.1126 +0100]:
what are your problems with CDBS?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00451.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00467.html
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`.
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive appears
to be converted successfully - if I do a diff operation, it reports
all files as deleted, but if I try to revert it, it slows to a
grinding halt.
Could you please run
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 10:58 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Are you doing conversions from SVN? Current bzr uses 20MB
Robert of ram to do a native branch operation in similar
Robert circumstances. (bug report gets fixed, new at
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Its likely to be a different bug - the conversion approach
Robert used for svn/baz is very different. That said, conversion
Robert from $any system is going to use more memory than native
Robert bzr operations, simply
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060801 18:17]:
also sprach Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1701 +0100]:
Missing $(DESTDIR)s in Makefiles are an example. Especially when the
install part was DESTDIRified, but the test before if the file is
already there (as make install
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Are you doing conversions from SVN? Current bzr uses 20MB
Robert of ram to do a native branch operation in similar
Robert circumstances. (bug report gets fixed, new at 11 :)).
No, this was a conversion from baz. Might be the
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
can still be done without granting shell access), or over plain http via
an apache rewrite rule.
Is it already
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
can still be done without granting shell access),
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
can
Adeodato == Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Adeodato But if you have a set of equal developers, bzr can be
Adeodato also used in a very similar way to Subversion, where all
Adeodato commits go to a central repository, and nobody has to
Adeodato collect
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 09:56 +1000, Brian May wrote:
For documentation on checkouts and bound branches, see
http://bazaar-vcs.org/CheckoutTutorial
http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrUsingBoundBranches
However, I am not convinced the following paragraph in the first
page is correct:
Getting a
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:31:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1501 +0100]:
snapshot.debian.net (still not-official but very usefull)
This is very interesting, especially in the light of version control
for packaging -- which
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 20:57 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
I'm using it when porting security fixes to sarge. If the maintainer has
fixed a security bug in sid, I download that version and the version
before and can see right away what exactly he changed to fix the bug.
This shouldn't need
also sprach Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.02.1020 +0100]:
This shouldn't need snapshot.debian.net, right?
If the bug is claimed to be fixed in the changelog of 2.0-5 and the
current sid version is 2.0-7, I don't know another way to see the diff
between 2.0-4 and 2.0-5, since
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
% bzr push
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
they want, and
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 21:44, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all
the branching, merging,
Adeodato Simó, 2006-08-02 21:20:09 +0200 :
% bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
[...]
Ask in #alioth. Note, however, that TTBOMK still does not offer HTTP
access, so if you want that, better stick to htdocs for a while.
I hope to be able to bribe buxy to provide
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:08:06PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
--
ciao,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 12:44:19PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.0005 +0100]:
Subversion, in conjunction with alioth, has risen dramatically in
Debian to accomodate team-based maintainance. There are of course
plenty of challengers,
* David Nusinow [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:37:23 +]:
(I'm seriously
interested in setting up git.debian.org for XSF work, for example*),
* If anyone else is interested in this, contact me and we'll talk
There is _something_ in costa:/srv/git.debian.org/git already.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:56:44PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* David Nusinow [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:37:23 +]:
(I'm seriously
interested in setting up git.debian.org for XSF work, for example*),
* If anyone else is interested in this, contact me and we'll talk
There is _something_
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 22:29 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
That's in fact an issue that made me feel sceptical about bzr, darcs
and
mercury. All of them require a shell account or some scripting through
a
special mail address to commit changes. And it's not only the recent
kernel
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
#include hallo.h
* Marco d'Itri [Tue, Aug 01 2006, 09:53:21AM]:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
Are you serious? (SCNR ;-)
No, debootstrap is an important toy
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:06:05AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Marco d'Itri [Tue, Aug 01 2006, 09:53:21AM]:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
+= piuparts
That's a bold
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Marco d'Itri [Tue, Aug 01 2006, 09:53:21AM]:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
Are you serious? (SCNR
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Marco d'Itri [Tue, Aug 01 2006, 09:53:21AM]:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think maintainers should really build and test their packages in
clean sid chroots. It's not important Whether these are set up with
debootstrap or any other method, and whether the handling is done
with
Frank Küster wrote:
There is also sbuild (which may be used with or without schroot to
manage the chroot). I prefer it to pbuilder, but I may be a little
biased ;-)
Isn't sbuild usually using a permanently unpacked chroot which persists
between different invocations of the tool? That's not
On Aug 01, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
Are you serious? (SCNR ;-)
Yes. I do not use either and I think I have been doing serious Debian
work so far.
Building in chroots
Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
There is also sbuild (which may be used with or without schroot to
manage the chroot). I prefer it to pbuilder, but I may be a little
biased ;-)
Isn't sbuild usually using a permanently unpacked chroot which persists
between
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
On Aug 01, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
Are you serious? (SCNR ;-)
Yes. I do not use either and I think I have been doing
also sprach David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.0005 +0100]:
Subversion, in conjunction with alioth, has risen dramatically in
Debian to accomodate team-based maintainance. There are of course
plenty of challengers, but subversion seems to beat them all.
I'd be interested in your
also sprach Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1221 +0100]:
Building in chroots *hides* bugs.
Uh, what? Please give an example.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
--
ciao,
Marco
Never used either one.
I have cdebootstrap do create chroots, dchroot
#include hallo.h
* Frank Küster [Tue, Aug 01 2006, 01:55:14PM]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
On Aug 01, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
Are you serious?
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:24:32AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
The sbuild package in debian however adds more features, like
schroot support. With this, it can use schroot to create
temporary, clean chroots from tarballs, block devices, create lvm
snapshots on the fly and so on. I read
Hi,
martin f krafft wrote:
Subversion, in conjunction with alioth, has risen dramatically in
Debian to accomodate team-based maintainance. There are of course
plenty of challengers, but subversion seems to beat them all.
I'd be interested in your thoughts as to why subversion beats them
On 8/1/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1221 +0100]:
Building in chroots *hides* bugs.
Uh, what? Please give an example.
The only example I can think of is programs that use configure to
include support for anything they can
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
[...]
While I already have a good selection, I am on the look for more.
Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
Debian development for a large number of people? Or do you remember
a tool that
also sprach Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1501 +0100]:
snapshot.debian.net (still not-official but very usefull
This is very interesting, especially in the light of version control
for packaging -- which could also make packages from the past
accessible.
Could you give me some
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:31:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Could you give me some insights, please, into how snapshot.d.n is
useful? Don't get me wrong, I also find it useful, but mostly from
the administrator perspective, I've not really used it as
a developer.
Binary searching for
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:31 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Could you give me some insights, please, into how snapshot.d.n is
useful? Don't get me wrong, I also find it useful, but mostly from
the administrator perspective, I've not really used it as
a developer.
I'm using it when porting
ti, 2006-08-01 kello 15:31 +0100, martin f krafft kirjoitti:
also sprach Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1501 +0100]:
snapshot.debian.net (still not-official but very usefull
This is very interesting, especially in the light of version control
for packaging -- which could also
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:31:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1501 +0100]:
snapshot.debian.net (still not-official but very usefull
This is very interesting, especially in the light of version control
for packaging -- which could
Christian Aichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:24:32AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
The sbuild package in debian however adds more features, like
schroot support. With this, it can use schroot to create
temporary, clean chroots from tarballs, block devices, create
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 13:44, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.0005
+0100]:
Subversion, in conjunction with alioth, has risen dramatically in
Debian to accomodate team-based maintainance. There are of course
plenty of challengers, but
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
martin f krafft wrote:
Subversion, in conjunction with alioth, has risen dramatically in
Debian to accomodate team-based maintainance. There are of course
plenty of challengers, but subversion seems to beat them all.
I'd be interested in your
Thanks, Christoph, I think you argued a good case!
I'll probably use bzr when I need to keep something revisioned
without much fuss just to save the time for svnadmin create and
a DAV share on my Apache. But for everything else I think I'll
stay with Subversion. And while I haven't tried it I
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060801 15:29]:
also sprach Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1221 +0100]:
Building in chroots *hides* bugs.
Uh, what? Please give an example.
Missing $(DESTDIR)s in Makefiles are an example. Especially when the
install part was DESTDIRified, but
also sprach Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1701 +0100]:
Missing $(DESTDIR)s in Makefiles are an example. Especially when the
install part was DESTDIRified, but the test before if the file is
already there (as make install does not want to overwrite a config file)
was forgotten.
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
--
ciao,
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks, Christoph, I think you argued a good case!
I'll probably use bzr when I need to keep something revisioned
without much fuss just to save the time for svnadmin create and
a DAV share on my Apache. But for everything else I think I'll
stay
also sprach Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1804 +0100]:
FYI: http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrForeignBranches/Subversion
Have you tryed it?
Not productively.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.0005 +0100]:
Subversion, in conjunction with alioth, has risen dramatically in
Debian to accomodate team-based maintainance. There are of course
plenty of challengers, but subversion seems to beat them all.
also sprach Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1907 +0100]:
I'd be interested in your thoughts as to why subversion beats them
all, in your perception.
I assumed he meant it in the sense that more teams seem to be
using subversion on alioth than any other RCS. Ie, compare
the list at
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1501 +0100]:
snapshot.debian.net (still not-official but very usefull
This is very interesting, especially in the light of version control
for packaging -- which could also make packages from the
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1907 +0100]:
[...]
I assumed he meant it in the sense that more teams seem to be
using subversion on alioth than any other RCS.
[...]
Yes, and I wanted to know why he thought that is the case. I
* Christoph Haas [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:33:15 +0200]:
Hi,
No offense intended - honestly - but the problem of passing
patches/patchsets around between the maintainers is really a problem. In
Subversion I know where the authoritative instance lies that is the master
instance keeping the
* Adeodato Simó [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:31:37 +0200]:
they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
% bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 07:19:19PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Yes, and I wanted to know why he thought that is the case. I believe
Christoph has given a good account of the reasons. If you have
anything to add, please do!
There's also the fact that well known teams like the installer and
also sprach Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1936 +0100]:
Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just make a
checkout (refer to the bzr docs), and every commit you make will go to
the main repo
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
% bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
We're
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:31:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Could you give me some insights, please, into how snapshot.d.n is
useful? Don't get me wrong, I also find it useful, but mostly from
the administrator perspective, I've not really used it as
a developer.
Testing of various
also sprach Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1537 +0100]:
Could you give me some insights, please, into how snapshot.d.n is
useful? Don't get me wrong, I also find it useful, but mostly from
the administrator perspective, I've not really used it as
a developer.
I'm using
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 19:44 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1936 +0100]:
Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just make a
checkout (refer to the
Stuff deleted
I have cdebootstrap do create chroots, dchroot to use them,
buildd/sbuild to test compile under true buildd conditions. Why would
I want something else?
I'm not sure I know, but now that I know about this pair, I will certainly look
into it. After that, if I can answer your
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
Debian development for a large number of people?
CDBS and alioth/svn.debian.org.
HTH,
Michael
With cdbs as
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.30.2139 +0100]:
I have Reply-To set for fear of horrible flame wars when one DD
bashes another one's favourite tool, but I will make the results
public, obviously. Thus, I appreciate if you could take the time to
drop me a short note if
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
Debian development for a large number of people?
[...]
How about
Am Montag 31 Juli 2006 17:08 schrieb Frank Küster:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
Debian development
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
As many of you know, I am conducting research on Debian,
specifically on how Debian developers adopt or reject new methods of
package maintenance. I would like to get a broad collection of data
for the
Dear fellow developers,
As many of you know, I am conducting research on Debian,
specifically on how Debian developers adopt or reject new methods of
package maintenance. I would like to get a broad collection of data
for the first part of my research, which is the study of tools that
have been
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
Debian development for a large number of people?
CDBS and alioth/svn.debian.org.
HTH,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
93 matches
Mail list logo
