* Simon Phipps:
> On Nov 18, 2008, at 03:52, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>> Many of the functions in portmap.c seem to correspond to
>> rpcbind (usr/src/cmd/rpcbind) in OpenSolaris:
>
> Is it just the function prototypes that are derived, or is there
> derived source defining them too?
>From our portm
* Simon Phipps:
> On Nov 5, 2008, at 23:23, Michael Banck wrote:
>>
>> - portmap.c
>>
>> /*
>> @(#)portmap.c 2.3 88/08/11 4.0 RPCSRC
>> static char sccsid[] = "@(#)portmap.c 1.32 87/08/06 Copyr 1984 Sun
>> Micro";
>> */
>>
>> This is portmap-6.0, from http://neil.brown.name/portmap/
>
> Is this
Thanks for the input.
On Nov 18, 2008, at 03:52, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Many of the functions in portmap.c seem to correspond to
rpcbind (usr/src/cmd/rpcbind) in OpenSolaris:
Is it just the function prototypes that are derived, or is there
derived source defining them too?
The key function
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 01:33 +, Simon Phipps wrote:
> Try OpenGrok: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/
The documentation for portmap says that some code is derived from "the
RPCSRC 4.0 and the TIRPC source distributions". The two source files
labelled with Sun copyright are portmap.c and from
Try OpenGrok: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/
On Nov 18, 2008, at 01:12, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I'll look into doing a pull on OpenSolaris and see what matches.
Does Sun have OpenSolaris loaded into a copy of Nutch somewhere?
That would be ever so useful.
- "Simon Phipps" <[EMAIL PR
I'll look into doing a pull on OpenSolaris and see what matches. Does Sun have
OpenSolaris loaded into a copy of Nutch somewhere? That would be ever so useful.
- "Simon Phipps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this in any way related to any Sun code, or is the string simply
> used by the au
On Nov 5, 2008, at 23:23, Michael Banck wrote:
- portmap.c
/*
@(#)portmap.c 2.3 88/08/11 4.0 RPCSRC
static char sccsid[] = "@(#)portmap.c 1.32 87/08/06 Copyr 1984 Sun
Micro";
*/
This is portmap-6.0, from http://neil.brown.name/portmap/
Is this in any way related to any Sun code, or is the
- "Michael Banck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code is copyrighted by Sun, not some particular employee, so AFAICT
> digging up who wrote it will not be necessary.
Please understand that asking Sun to relicense source is a little like asking
Debian to hurry up and release Lenny. Differen
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 05:07:07PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> > Assuming Sun is the sole copyright holder of that code, he could advise
> > their IP laywers/whoever to relicense the code; either to the glibc
> > license (LGPL-1.2 or later, currently), or perhaps the BSD license. The
> > latter
- "Michael Banck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assuming Sun is the sole copyright holder of that code, he could advise
> their IP laywers/whoever to relicense the code; either to the glibc
> license (LGPL-1.2 or later, currently), or perhaps the BSD license. The
> latter would probably be bes
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:32:35PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
> "delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems". He
> wanted to note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the
> time when Sun release
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:32:35PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
> "delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems". He wanted to
> note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the time when Sun
> rele
I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
"delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems". He wanted to
note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the time when Sun
released to the community and they couldn't have predicted that it would
vi
13 matches
Mail list logo
