For some time now, the runtime dependencies of init.d scripts have
been documented in the scripts, using the LSB convention. Now, enough
scripts have this information present to make a useful graph of the
dependencies in the debian boot. The current state of affairs in my
sid chroot look like th
On Sep 07, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some time now, the runtime dependencies of init.d scripts have
> been documented in the scripts, using the LSB convention. Now, enough
> scripts have this information present to make a useful graph of the
> dependencies in the debian
Le jeu 7 septembre 2006 15:11, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> On Sep 07, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For some time now, the runtime dependencies of init.d scripts have
> > been documented in the scripts, using the LSB convention. Now,
> > enough scripts have this information prese
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> as depending on udev actually do.
None, because udev isn't actually a hard dependency for any of those
scripts, so listing it as such is wrong.
--
Home is where
On Sep 07, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png >
> > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > as depending on udev actually do.
> your point beeing ?
That if you want a really dependency-based
On Sep 07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > as depending on udev actually do.
> None, because udev isn't actually a hard dependency for any of those
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-07 15:11]:
> On Sep 07, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For some time now, the runtime dependencies of init.d scripts have
> > been documented in the scripts, using the LSB convention. Now, enough
> > scripts have this information
Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006 à 15:18 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit :
> > > http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png >
> > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > as depending on udev actually do.
>
> I can't think of a single one that would not
This one time, at band camp, Josselin Mouette said:
> Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006 à 15:18 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit :
> >
> > I can't think of a single one that would not work with good old static
> > dev tough udev might be the recommended way.
>
> But nevertheless, they won't work if udev
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-07 17:11]:
> On Sep 07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > > as depending on udev actually do.
> >
On Thursday 07 September 2006 12:03, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> For some time now, the runtime dependencies of init.d scripts have
> been documented in the scripts, using the LSB convention. Now,
> enough scripts have this information present to make a useful graph
> of the dependencies in the d
[Francesco Pedrini]
> I've tried, but it doesn't work:
You need to use insserv version 1.08.0-3 or later. Sorry for
forgetting to mention that.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /usr/share/insserv/check-initd-order -g -o
>>lsb-graph.dot
There is no need to run it as root, I believe. It only need t
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:09:49PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > > as depending on udev actually do
[Wouter Verhelst]
> My point being that you don't want to list them as hard dependencies
> unless you really need udev and can't work with static devices for
> some other reason.
I suspect very few packages should depend on udev. Most packages
depend on local and remote file systems being mounte
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The scripts listed in the upper right corner are all those scripts
> without dependency information available. This is the complete list
> for my installation:
>
> hwclockfirst.sh ifupdown-clean modutils hwclock.sh libdevmapper1.01
> libdevmapper1.02 lvm hibernat
[Nathanael Nerode]
> syslog-ng also lacks information.
If you find such packages, please report bugs to bts about it. Most
of the base system and selected packages I use often have such bugs
reported against them, but there are lots of packages left to fix.
> The udev dependency information is
16 matches
Mail list logo
