Package: ia32-libs-gtk
Version: 20120102
Severity: normal
Goswin von Brederlow, le Fri 22 Jun 2012 11:34:12 +0200, a écrit :
And then there is also ia32-libs-gtk [2], which is not yet installable as
multiarch:
#677762 ia32-libs-gtk: Multiarch issues
---
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:57:29PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Release notes are meant to be read once, not every time you upgrade a
system. Having a debconf note once might be appropriate. The second
time, you'll go right, I've seen that before.
On 06/24/2012 06:01 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3:
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl writes:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:07:56PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
It has to be held back. But apt-get/aptitude might select a solution
where they do get removed rather then hold back many other packages.
I'm hoping it will be held back
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:57:29PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Release notes are meant to be read once, not every time you upgrade a
system. Having a debconf note once might be appropriate. The second
time, you'll go right, I've seen that before. The third time you go
sigh, yes, I know,
On 06/23/2012 02:18 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Problem is that frontends will complain about ia32-libs being not
upgradable and might suggest removing it instead of keeping it back way
before that. At the time base-file is upgraded ia32-libs and all other
32bit stuff might already have
On 06/23/2012 02:48 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The helpfull error messages and holding back packages would have to be
ported to stable apt/aptitude to be any use for upgrades. And only
people updating to the latest stable point release would benefit from
it.
Unfortunately, we never
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
On 06/23/2012 02:48 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The helpfull error messages and holding back packages would have to be
ported to stable apt/aptitude to be any use for upgrades. And only
people updating to the latest stable point release would benefit
On 06/23/2012 08:23 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Unfortunately, we never require that our users upgrade to the latest
point release before upgrading to stable+1.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#system-status
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
On Sat, June 23, 2012 08:25, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
On 06/23/2012 02:48 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The helpfull error messages and holding back packages would have to be
ported to stable apt/aptitude to be any use for upgrades. And only
people
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
On 06/23/2012 02:18 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Problem is that frontends will complain about ia32-libs being not
upgradable and might suggest removing it instead of keeping it back way
before that. At the time base-file is upgraded ia32-libs and all
On 06/23/2012 03:10 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 06/23/2012 08:23 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Unfortunately, we never require that our users upgrade to the latest
point release before upgrading to stable+1.
On Jun 23, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
We've frequently required users to upgrade specific packages to newer
versions prior to the general dist-upgrade to resolve various issues, such
as for the udev transition.
FWIW, what we required was to upgrade the kernel and udev at the same
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:07:56PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
It has to be held back. But apt-get/aptitude might select a solution
where they do get removed rather then hold back many other packages.
I'm hoping it will be held back automatically without user intervention
but that might
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3: dist-upgrade (ia32-libs, wine, ... is now
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:18:03PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
May I suggest that upon upgrade, we have a debconf message telling
about it? We could add this in base-files or any essential package,
probably one with some debconf messages already in would be a better
pick.
Hi,
two weeks ago we hit a huge milestone with multiarch and wine:i386
became installable on amd64. Last week we hit another milestone so that
ia32-libs became mostly installable (it might still want to remove some
amd64 packages in the process depending on what you have installed).
As a
On Jun 22, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3: dist-upgrade (ia32-libs, wine, ... is now installable)
Maybe this is easier?
1: upgrade dpkg and apt
2: dpkg
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3: dist-upgrade (ia32-libs, wine, ... is now installable)
May I suggest that upon upgrade, we have a debconf
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3: dist-upgrade (ia32-libs, wine, ... is now
On 22.06.2012 15:31, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3:
On 06/22/2012 04:31 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3:
On 06/22/2012 07:37 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
On 06/22/2012 04:31 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Doesn't the Ubuntu updater tool do something like this already when
it does a full upgrade between releases?
There were quite some bugs with
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3: dist-upgrade (ia32-libs, wine, ... is now installable)
May I suggest
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Jun 22, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3: dist-upgrade (ia32-libs, wine, ... is now installable)
Maybe this is
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
On 06/22/2012 04:31 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture
On ven., 2012-06-22 at 11:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
#677787 gtk2-engines-xfce: Please add multiarch support
Note that this one (as investigated in the bug report by Goswin and me)
is a bit spurious. For multi-arch Gtk+ apps, a multi-arch engine
matching the theme used by the end user
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On 22.06.2012 15:31, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 19:37 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On 06/22/2012 04:31 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg
30 matches
Mail list logo
