]] Adam Majer
| The obvious answer is it did not. On the contrary, it allows
| questionably built packages into Sid potentially breaking other
| package's dependencies. Consider,
|
| 1. libfoofoo maintainer uploads with binary and new ABI for AMD64
| 2. libfoofoo FTBFS
| 3. ubberapp mainta
Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:45:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> 1. https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=udunits
> 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545653
> 3. https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=hdf-eos4
> 4. https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=hdf-eos5
H
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:45:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Charles Plessy (12/11/2009):
> Look at e.g. the history of non-buildability for Alastair McKinstry's
> packages. udunits[1,2] comes to mind. (Note I don't think I'm a
> carebear, but that I'm not that used to YELLING in bugreports.
Charles Plessy (12/11/2009):
> I am not the one who calls people sloppy, stupid or candid on this
> list.
You started talking about people being non sloppy, that was not my
language. (Or maybe I didn't dig enough to find another mention of it
earlier in the thread, my bad should that be the case.
Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 02:18:16AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> Nice to see you assert your gut feeling is right and that stupid
> people are candid enough to believe in myths.
>
> When you change your mind and actually start caring, try and check
> what you're talking about, try and dig
Playing-with-the-subject-season? Alright.
Charles Plessy (12/11/2009):
> I do not think that such a list would contain more than 10 names
> after removing the MIA DDs. Most of the aggressivity on Debian
> Planet, and most of the examples I received in private in the past
> point at the same perso
6 matches
Mail list logo
