Just wanted to mention another approach that avoids guessing at which
files need to be touched and in what order. This is what I use in
debian/rules when I need to modify automake source files:
# Suppress accidental execution of the auto-* tools; see
# http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/de
Sam Hocevar wrote:
> ... or fix the timestamps of the various auto* files before calling
> configure. Use something like this: (order is important)
>
> touch configure.ac \ (or configure.in)
> && touch aclocal.m4 \
> && touch configure \
> && touch config.h.in \
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>See also /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
Thanks for the hint, which hopefully prevents me from any future automake
caused frequent wordnet uploads.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:27:54AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would love to do so but it happened to me that the files I created seem
> to depend from automake. I do not call any automake script - just
> the usual
>configure; make; make install
> but I had to add a build-dependency f
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would love to do so but it happened to me that the files I created seem
> to depend from automake. I do not call any automake script - just
> the usual
>configure; make; make install
> but I had to add a build-dependency from automake accordin
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
> In general, Debian source packages should not need to build-depend on
> automake. In theory, the author should already care to create an
> original tarball with all the required things already created
> (in fact, it is part of GNU standards that packages
Andreas Tille wrote:
> regarding to bug #215554 I would like to ask for my personal clarification:
> Which sens makes automake if the resulting output depends from every new
> subsubversion?
>
> I've thought that I would do the wordnet program some good if I would add
> automake stuff. Since I sw
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Andreas Tille wrote:
> regarding to bug #215554 I would like to ask for my personal clarification:
> Which sens makes automake if the resulting output depends from every new
> subsubversion?
>
> I've thought that I would do the wordnet program some good if I would add
> automa
Hi,
regarding to bug #215554 I would like to ask for my personal clarification:
Which sens makes automake if the resulting output depends from every new
subsubversion?
I've thought that I would do the wordnet program some good if I would add
automake stuff. Since I switched to auotmake1.7 I have
9 matches
Mail list logo
